|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The moons, eclipses, and timing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
In that case, the colossal number of eclipses that have occurred where fuck-all happened represents far stronger evidence that god doesn't exist than your one iffy example does that he does. Thank you for evidentially confirming atheism. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
So either behave at least like a semi-professional or don't even bother. But I'm not a semi-professional...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
we are talking about the evidence for the most important event in the history of mankind (the death of Christ on the cross) which is born up by a multitude of evidences, historical testimonies, and natural phenomena that occurred as was foretold, but you treat the subject like trash. Just to be clear, are you saying there was a lunar or solar eclipse in AD33? And what is your evidence that Jesus died in AD33? Mark Edited by mark24, : No reason given. There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
You're right. You're not only not a 'semi-professionl' but you haven't learned to read carefully yet. Go back and read the topic post for your answer. Well, I did, you seem to be talking about both. So please confirm which, or indeed both. Anyway, what's professionalism got to do with your OP's ambiguity?
Perhaps it was based on the birth of Madylyn Murray O'Hare? Makes no sense to me, please can you elaborate on why this is evidence of Jesus' death being in AD33, or whenever? A more professional answer please, at least try to meet your own standards. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Thanks, anglagard, just wondering what all the sky darkening is in the OP.
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
Perhaps the darkness was due to...clouds? Wow! How unlikely is that! Jesus dies on a day with clouds, it must be true! You are way, way to credulous when it comes to what you will accept as evidence in support of your views & exactly the opposite when it comes to what doesn't. Special pleading.... Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
he passes it off so lightly as if it were nothing. It is nothing. You are claiming a lunar eclipse happened, & one of your own sources states a solar eclipse occurred at the same time, clearly impossible.
(3) the corroboration of eyewitnesses What eyewitnesses were there that allegedly saw this solar eclipse? Your OP doesn't cite any.
the confirmation of natural phenomena by computer analysis on eclipses A solar & a lunar eclipse at the same time is impossible.
prophetic utterances What prophetic utterances prophesised that the sky would go dark when Jesus was killed?
It was probably a supernatural event. Right, so you're trying to "prove" the crucifixion of Christ by claiming another supernatural event demonstrates it? Riiiiight. For the record, & just to bring you back to reality, Calypsis, you are attempting to show us that the alignment/coincidence of natural events was indicative of Jesus crucifixion. Invoking untestable supernatural events to prove a supernatural event doesn't count. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
That will cost you eternally. What an awful attitude. But your argument IS nothing regarding the darkening of the skies. You have claimed that there is some kind of natural confluence of events supported by a prophecy you haven't cited, eye witnesses you haven't named, the a lunar & solar eclipse naturally happening at the same time which is impossible. Let's face it, you fucked up. & the best you can do in response to this is:
You are nothing. And you are something beginning with C, but it ain't Calypsis. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
You're a sorry reprobate. You have no idea what Almighty God can do. So? You are supposed to be supplying natural correlations that confirm JC's death. Claiming god helped xyz along only traps you in a circular argument: you have to believe god performed a miracle to make something happen, & that confirms gods existence. You have to accept the conclusion before you can accept the premises. Your list of logical fallacies grows longer... So, be a grown up & tell me what prophecy the darkening sky was in, what alleged eyewitnesses there were, & explain how both a solar & lunar eclipse can occur at the same time as attested by your own sources. But let's face it, you can't because you are lying for Jesus. You know it, we know it, it's a facade. If you could have done it you would have provided the necessary details & put me in my place several posts back. But you can't because you are lying. And you have the gall to call me names, you should be embarrassed. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Calypsis,
'Supernatural' IS an answer whether you like it or not. Not in this thread. For at least the third time, you are supposed to be providing natural correlations that allegedly confirm JC's death. Invoking the supernatural traps you in a circular argument. And this is for the second time, concluding god by invoking god means you have to accept the conclusion in order to accept the premise, this is a circular argument, yet another of your beloved logical fallacies. So even if invoking the supernatural in this thread were relevant, which it isn't, it would be logically fallacious as an argument if you did. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024