EvC Forum: Unintelligent design (recurrent laryngeal nerve)

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Unintelligent design (recurrent laryngeal nerve)

Taq

Member

Posts: 10085

Joined: 03-06-2009

Member Rating: 5.6

Normal Thread Display

Message 352 of 480 (566623)
06-25-2010 3:05 PM

Reply to: Message 350 by slevesque
06-25-2010 3:03 PM

Re: We're still waiting

tell me how much research has been done on this ?

150 years of modern medicine and anatomical study.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 350 by slevesque, posted 06-25-2010 3:03 PM		slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 355 by slevesque, posted 06-25-2010 3:11 PM		Taq has not replied

Taq

Member

Posts: 10085

Joined: 03-06-2009

Member Rating: 5.6

Normal Thread Display

Message 382 of 480 (566858)
06-28-2010 9:37 AM

Reply to: Message 375 by Big_Al35
06-28-2010 6:29 AM

I can only assume that the evolutionists are being so stubborn about not wanting to pursue research into this field because if they are found to be wrong then the other function/purpose becomes strong evidence for intelligent design.

What other function? Evidence please.

if the secondary purpose of the indirect route was found to be as a sound/vibration dampener using the aorta . . .

Oh dear. Did you even start to think that one through? That is wrong for so many reasons.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 375 by Big_Al35, posted 06-28-2010 6:29 AM		Big_Al35 has not replied

Taq

Member

Posts: 10085

Joined: 03-06-2009

Member Rating: 5.6

Normal Thread Display

Message 390 of 480 (566903)
06-28-2010 1:38 PM

Here is a nice pic showing the right RLN looping under the right subclavian artery and the left RLN looping under the aortic arch.

source: http://www.pitt.edu/~anat/Head/Larynx/Larynx.htm

Taq

Member

Posts: 10085

Joined: 03-06-2009

Member Rating: 5.6

Normal Thread Display

Message 402 of 480 (567024)
06-29-2010 10:45 AM

Reply to: Message 400 by Big_Al35
06-29-2010 9:00 AM

Re: Beyond reasonable doubt.

Haven't we heard this one before!

Haven't you dodged this before?

Is it good design to run 100 feet of power cord around your living room, around the legs on the sofa, around the floor lamp, and then finally into the outlet that is just 3 feet from where you started? yes/no?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 400 by Big_Al35, posted 06-29-2010 9:00 AM		Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 403 by Big_Al35, posted 06-30-2010 6:25 AM		Taq has not replied

Taq

Member

Posts: 10085

Joined: 03-06-2009

Member Rating: 5.6

Normal Thread Display

Message 414 of 480 (567751)
07-02-2010 1:01 PM

Reply to: Message 411 by Big_Al35
07-02-2010 6:16 AM

Re: Beyond reasonable doubt.

My concern anyway is not that the path matches a doorway but that some contributors couldn't envisage the need for longer cabling in a domestic situation nevermind the more complex human anatomy structure.

And if there is absolutely no evidence for any need for longer cabling, then what? Wouldn't it be bad design?

Why would someone design the recurrent laryngeal nerve the way it has been designed. There need be no further rationale than because one can.

So no matter what the design looks like you will claim that it was intelligently designed? Do you think that Rube Goldberg mechanisms should be put in engineering textbooks and not in the comics?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 411 by Big_Al35, posted 07-02-2010 6:16 AM		Big_Al35 has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	DrJones*, PaulK
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0