I keep asking you to stop using the term "Neo-Darwinism".
Why should I stop using it? The reason I use it to to make sure that no one misunderstand what I am talking about.
I'm arguing that the theory of evolution and common ancestry are essentially the same thing.
You clearly do not know what evolution is. So answer this, is evolution possible without common ancestry?
It's possible to be a nominal bus driver and not drive a bus; it's not possible to be an actual bus driver and not drive a bus. Your examples are nominal scientists, not actual scientists.
You do not become a real teacher the day you teach your first class, you're a real teacher when you graduate from college with a degree in education. Same goes for other professions. Sorry I don't buy your distinctions between actual and nominal!
Does a walker have to walk
This is completely different from profession, you become a real doctor the moment you graduate.
There used to be a commercial that said, "I'm not a real doctor but I play one on TV." That's what your examples are.
An actor pretending to be a doctor is not the same thing as someone with a medical degree.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.