|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14174dm Member (Idle past 1138 days) Posts: 161 From: Cincinnati OH Joined:
|
We all work from somewhere! If you start with the answer you want - humans are the most important thing in the universe - you get geocentrism, which is wrong because it doesn't fit all the facts. Geocentric model - Wikipedia If you try to force the observed facts to your preconceived answer, you get geoheliocentrism - which is wrong because it doesn't fit all the facts. Tychonic system - Wikipedia If you start with the facts and try to figure out the answer - the scientific method - you get heliocentrism - the most likely to be right because it fits the known facts. Heliocentrism - Wikipedia If you are using the scientific method, you test your answer. For example a space probe like the Cassini probe interesting multiple planets as they move through space based on your calculations using the heliocentric model. Gravity assist - Wikipedia Which specific facts related to the age of the universe do not fit the generally accepted science? Edited by 14174dm, : Clarification Edited by 14174dm, : Clarity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
I agree, and await evidence time exists in the far universe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
The SN1987a event is fine. It was claimed we use trigonometry and I pointed out that means assuming and believing time exists there as her...for NO reason. Is that all you have is beliefs to peddle??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Great so where is the evidence that the time you requite to know things like distances exists where the stars are? Cough it up man.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
?? What in tarnation you talking about? The baseline is the well...base line. Example, a measure from earth to a star in June, and another one in Dec, then they draw a line in our space to get the distance. We know the distances of the orbit of earth, so they then come up with a certain number of miles...I have to tell you this??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
quote:I start with what is known. I also look at what posters here claim. Concern yourself with supporting your position, not inventing phantom reasons why another poster has a position. quote:Great so no forcing facts. Maybe at least start posting a few?? quote:Impossible in origins issues. Let's see you test time in the far universe with that!? If not all is lost for your position. quote: The planets are near earth, so are irrelevant to the issue here. As to being interesting, of course creation is interesting..no credit to cassini.
quote: Too vague...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
starlite writes: Are you suggesting that there is no time at all in the far universe? I agree, and await evidence time exists in the far universe. By the way, I also am a moderator and wish to remind you that while it may be an adrenaline rush to do a driveby, it is better to get to know people and challenge yourself. You can be a leader or you can be a Chuunibyou the choice is up to you. The mods will suspend you if you seek only the thrill of a driveby, but if you want to open up and tell me about your life, goals, passions and plans, i'll respectfully listen. I won't be nice to a Chuunibyou, however. Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
quote:Who knows? Until we do one doesn't know now does one? quote: The thread about the big bang and age of the universe doesn't really involve personal details. I can handle any poster on any detail of any issue though. It isn't me that will be running.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 197 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
I agree, and await evidence time exists in the far universe. Provided, and you ignored it. SN 1987A and the decay of 56Ni. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 197 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
It was claimed we use trigonometry and I pointed out that means assuming and believing time exists there as her...for NO reason No, you asserted that means assuming and believing time exists there as here. I'm waiting on you to prove that. As scientists do (insofar as anyting is proven in sceince).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 197 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
?? What in tarnation you talking about? The baseline is the well...base line. Example, a measure from earth to a star in June, and another one in Dec, then they draw a line in our space to get the distance. We know the distances of the orbit of earth, so they then come up with a certain number of miles...I have to tell you this?? I have to tell you again and again that the distance to SN1987A was not measured using a triangle with the Earth's orbit as a baseline? Your ignorance is showing again, and your predilection (common for YECs) to make up stories based on your ignorance rather than investigating reality.. The Earth was at the tip of the triangle. The baseline was a line from SN1987A to a ring of debris about a light-year from SN1987A. Further explained with a nice diagram at the reference I gave previously, The Age of the Universe and SN1987A. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 197 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
I start with what is known. It's pretty obvious you start with a vague idea of a few scientific findings and your unshakable conviction on YEC, and the bulk of what you post is made up based on your ignorance. Claiming otherwise just undermines your credibility further. You are posting to (obviously not discussing to) people who know far more about the relevant subjects than you do. Your arrogance is unwarranted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Please explain how that has anything at all to do with whether time exists there? If not why continue ignoring facts?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Let's be honest and clear, I am saying you do not know and your posts confirm that. I am asking you to stop with the bare assertions that there is time there as we know it. As I pointed out that is the sole basis for the distances and the sizes and etc etc etc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2943 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
You confirm you do not understand how the measure is taken and what it is comprised of. If any other poster wants to know we can discuss that. You have shown yourself to be boringly closed minded.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024