|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Free will vs Omniscience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0
|
As a christian, I'm not interested in figuring out Gods reasoning,morality, or how and why some are known by him and others are not. I trust his perfection. It is my own issues that I worry (and pray) about. If in fact God (for some reason which you refer to as a voodoo entity) has a divine plan, I'm more interested in my own conduct and behavior rather than worrying if I get voodooed or not.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9512 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phat writes: I'm more interested in my own conduct and behavior rather than worrying if I get voodooed or not. So give up the voodoo, you'd make a decent human being if you didn't waste so much of your time, effort and mindspace worrying about stuff that even it exists you couldn't begin to understand.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Well, sure. I trust Long John Silver's one-legged agility. That's the way the character is written.
I trust his perfection. Phat writes:
So what does your own conduct and behaviour have to do with any external entity?
If in fact God (for some reason which you refer to as a voodoo entity) has a divine plan, I'm more interested in my own conduct and behavior rather than worrying if I get voodooed or not.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined:
|
Phat writes: 1) Picture a Creator of all seen and unseen. As far as the topic goes, your entire 3-part understanding either includes free-will or not depending on how this "creation" went. Was there ever a moment (perhaps before the creation, perhaps during it..) where the Creator did not know the future of the creation? If yes - then I can logically see free will fitting in. Perhaps just un-intuitively, as my idea suggests. If no - then I cannot see a way free will could actually fit in. This would imply a creator thinking up our futures... and then creating them and "so it shall be." Such a mechanical creation seems to eliminate the possibility for free will, as I understand it.
Does this make sense? I hope the above answers your question in context to this topic. If you're looking for something beyond the mere presence of free will... if your understanding makes sense in general... it's not something I have knowledge of Personally, to me, from my experience... no, it all sounds a bit... created-by-man.But, so does my idea of forcing the existence of free-will into a universe where it's possible to know the future. Can it make logical sense? I guess so... as much as we can say it does without knowing how a universe "logically" comes into being anyway. Does it make reasonable sense?I think the way Cat Sci is explaining free will (the present is a fundamental reality of how time works, and therefore no one... not even a God... can "see the future" without removing free will). Is the most likely candidate of how things actually work. All the evidence we have seems to fit this picture, and it's the simplest picture without adding unnecessary elements. Both my idea of free-will-with-the-ability-of-knowing-the-future and your understanding-presented-here include aspects that must be assumed simply to make the ideas work. There's no evidence for my idea that "we're playing back a recording" and there's no evidence for the existence of God, Jesus or a "Beast." There's nothing logically ruling them out... as long as they exist in some as-yet-undiscovered (or even beyond-our-ability-to-discover) form. But invoking the unknown isn't generally a good way to go about understanding reality. It's merely a tool to keep our minds aware of the fact that we don't know everything... this helps leave us open to the possibility of being wrong... which allows us to move onto a closer-to-the-truth explanation when/if new information comes along. If you want to seriously pursue either idea as an actual aspect of reality (other than a though-experiment simply to prove a logically possible point)... then I would suggest the next step is to figure out a way to find evidence to back the idea. You would need to devise a test of some sort.Some way to differentiate between "being a recording" vs. "not being a recording." Or a way to tell the difference between "a Beast indeed exists" vs. "a universe where no Beast exists." If you could develop such tests, and run them, and the result happens to be what you're looking for... then you have the beginnings of a foundation for showing that such ideas are actually a part of reality. Without such tests, unfortunately, these ideas must remain in the realm of "playful imaginings of things that are not impossible."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Was there ever a moment (perhaps before the creation, perhaps during it..) where the Creator did not know the future of the creation? No. God was, Is and always will be. There is never a moment that He was not.(or was unaware)
If no - then I cannot see a way free will could actually fit in. This would imply a creator thinking up our futures... and then creating them and "so it shall be." Such a mechanical creation seems to eliminate the possibility for free will, as I understand it. I disagree. IF God is with me during every moment that I live, it is irrelevant whether He observes my free will in the past, present or future. In fact, the ONLY way that I could have a free will unknown by Him is if I myself were unknown by Him. Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
I think the way Cat Sci is explaining free will (the present is a fundamental reality of how time works, and therefore no one... not even a God... can "see the future" without removing free will). Is the most likely candidate of how things actually work. All the evidence we have seems to fit this picture, and it's the simplest picture without adding unnecessary elements. You guys dont get it. The Body Of Christ is composed of those who know Christ and whom he knows. The Beast is essentially the "Body" of the Antichrist. Those unknown by God. The Body of Christ was, (known before the foundations of the world) IS and forever will be. The Beast once was (As a freewilled Lucifer who chose to rebel and become unknown) IS NOT (unknown by God) and yet IS for those whose names are not written in the Book of Life.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
All the evidence we have seems to fit this picture, and it's the simplest picture without adding unnecessary elements. What evidence? How are you able to determine via observation exactly how 'free will' works? How do you test the effect of omniscience? What I suspect is that people are comfortable with one or the other philosophical answer or one or more logical argument. But there is no evidence regarding any of this stuff. ABE: Observation suggests that we have at least the illusion of free will. So we might lean towards saying that free will exists. However, we don't have any way of simulating time machines, omniscient beings, all powerful OZ's or rocks too heavy for God to lift. So how are you concluding that the evidence is on one side or the other? Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
It's nice to know there's something God doesn't know. You guys dont get it. The Body Of Christ is composed of those who know Christ and whom he knows. The Beast is essentially the "Body" of the Antichrist. Those unknown by God. As you know, I have campaigned before to be removed from His list.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Perhaps God is preparing you to be satans defense attorney.
OR....perhaps you are referring to the naughty list, of which i would also want my name removed. Edited by Phat, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
I would like to be on the list of things He doesn't know.
OR....perhaps you are referring to the naughty list, of which i would also want my name removed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
ringo writes: I would like to be on the list of things He doesn't know. Would Him knowing you and/or everything about you take away your free will? Or is there another reason you reject this potential relationship?Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
Well, that's the problem that's being discussed in this and countless other threads. Believers insist that there are rewards attached to a relationship with Him but the rewards always have strings attached. It's, "Do as I say and you'll be rewarded." Why would I want a relationship like that? If there was real free will, there would have to be an opt-out clause. I'll accept the natural consequences of my actions but you can keep the eternal damnation and the eternal reward.
Would Him knowing you and/or everything about you take away your free will?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Believers insist that there are rewards attached to a relationship with Him but the rewards always have strings attached. It's, "Do as I say and you'll be rewarded." Why would I want a relationship like that? If there was real free will, there would have to be an opt-out clause. I'll accept the natural consequences of my actions but you can keep the eternal damnation and the eternal reward. So tell Him that. In my opinion, its not as you say. Nobody wants a relationship of any kind if they have to start obeying the other person and get bribed and threatened. Personally, I think that honest skeptics have as good of a shot or better than "true" believers do. And you are right. Who cares about eternal reward? Lets just have a great communion today...in the present moment.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined: |
Phat writes: In fact, the ONLY way that I could have a free will unknown by Him is if I myself were unknown by Him. I agree with this statement.
Phat writes: Stile writes: I cannot see a way free will could actually fit in. This would imply a creator thinking up our futures... and then creating them and "so it shall be." Such a mechanical creation seems to eliminate the possibility for free will, as I understand it. I disagree. IF God is with me during every moment that I live, it is irrelevant whether He observes my free will in the past, present or future. An observation implies that one does not know what will happen... that they are watching to find out and see. Is God "observing" you? Or is God watching you play out the programming He put into your life at creation? When God created you with full knowledge of your entire life... did the idea of your entire life enter God's mind at some point? Can you say it *came from you* in any way?Or did God think up a man who will be doing x, y and z throughout their lives... and then make that happen? The first way implies that God (at some point in time) did not have full knowledge of your life. This way, I can see free-will being preserved. The second way implies that God thought up and programmed a robot. You're simply running through the programming God initially desired. This does not conform to any definition of free will I could accept.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined:
|
Phat writes: You guys dont get it. Ha ha Phat, the trick is... nobody "get's it." The secrets to life, the universe and everything?The Bible doesn't have the answers. I don't have the answers. You don't have the answers. Science doesn't have the answers. Religion doesn't have the answers. No one and no body of knowledge ever collected by humans has ever had the answers. If the answers to that were known, we would not be asking these questions... they would already be answered. Therefore, if you're going to offer a solution... you're going to have to back it up with a bit more than "this is my interpretation of the Bible." Many people have their own interpretation of the Bible.Many people have their own interpretation of the scientific ideas. Many people have their own interpretation of their own experiences. Until any of it is shown to be valid in any way at all... we're all in the same, empty boat.
The Body Of Christ is composed of those who know Christ and whom he knows. The Beast is essentially the "Body" of the Antichrist. Those unknown by God. The Body of Christ was, (known before the foundations of the world) IS and forever will be. The Beast once was (As a freewilled Lucifer who chose to rebel and become unknown) IS NOT (unknown by God) and yet IS for those whose names are not written in the Book of Life. Maybe. Maybe not. But none of this helps us determine if God can create us with full knowledge of who we are and what we're going to do and preserve free will or not.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024