Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   All about Brad McFall.
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 179 of 300 (181853)
01-30-2005 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Brad McFall
08-03-2004 8:46 PM


....
McFall writes:
...BUT BECAUSE IT WAS A MAXIST REALIST PHILOSOPHER'S WIFE WHO WAS A PSYCHOLOGIST WHOM INFORMED THE TEACHER WHO CALLED MY PARENTS AND TOLD THEM I WAS INSANE....
Sorry, but I MUST ask; how did you handle that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Brad McFall, posted 08-03-2004 8:46 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Brad McFall, posted 01-30-2005 5:59 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 300 (181971)
01-31-2005 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 180 by Brad McFall
01-30-2005 5:59 PM


!!
Good grief, Brad; I'm glad I asked. I had no idea you were so entwined in all this. But you should revisit the past anyway to make sure you're not deceiving yourself. As for the Freeman Dyson view, I suggest you drop that completely as you'll see why when you take a closer look at Edgar Cayce's reconciliation of fundamental Christianity tenets.
But as for your:
McFall writes:
...MULTIPLE humanist scopes IN Gould's notion of "magesteria" supported biologically by natural kinds THAT POLKINGHORNE AND I JUDGE is wrong!...
That's where you went wrong!!! Your theory would be correct if Gould's magesteria were overlapping (like you seem to think), but it NON-overlapping! What this means is the day you leave EVCForum is when your problems will rapidly begin to increase exponentially! Don't say I didn't warn you! You need to engage in more anomalous subjective experiences and many of your problems in this area would cease, especially with the cheerleaders.
And:
McFall writes:
...I never knew his wife. I saw her in a rally in Ithaca since but I marched with the Church as they both turned around and looked back...
Well, I DO know his wife very well and I'm telling you it's all just a case of mistaken identity. She had money problems and couldn't afford new glasses, but it didn't bode well for those around her. So please go easy on her, and don't take it out on her husband (she doesn't know about his latest mistress yet).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Brad McFall, posted 01-30-2005 5:59 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 8:51 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 186 of 300 (182059)
01-31-2005 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by Brad McFall
01-31-2005 8:51 AM


Oh, no!
Brad! You completely missed my point! I SAID it was CLEARLY a case of MISTAKEN IDENTITY! Based on disjunctive syllogism , I think you may have a servere case of cysticercosis (or you WOULD have understood my writings perhaps) that needs to be diagnosed by a profesional very quickly before its too late! That idea that you think Ithica is a small place was another clue because its a HUGE place, much bigger than you can imagine but you can't see it as long as my suspicions are correct.
Note that this could also affect your court case as well as the issues with the cheerleaders and pom-pons. The fact that Martha Stewart online is no longer in business shouldn't HAVE a great impact on you, although I could BE wrong; you should still be careful anyway. Also others could be lying in wait for you somewhere, but we'll help you as much as possible.
And I disagree with you regarding that; instead I'm convinced Popper's theory of falsification is by far better than Inductivism by several orders of magnitude. The reluctantly omnivorous intellectual Waismann cannot convince a hard-core disbeliever, even after having planted the seeds, though not being fully capable of either, and despite possessing complex character, regardless. I think your personal agenda is a complete distraction for the audience.
The fact that the Parapsychological phenomenon vanishes whenever a skeptical vibration suddenly appears, but that DOESN'T change a THING! You're just doing linguistic somersaults! Preparatory station socialism, along with its promised paradise on earth, not to mention the fears of the proletariat, massacred working people in the name of working people! This is clearly diabolical, and borders on making DeMorgan's Theorem look stupid, but you and your partners seem to see it as a liberating paradigm somehow! Have you forgetten about the advantages of the Copernican system over the Ptolemaic system, which simply CANNOT be ignored despite what your girlfriend seems to believe?! I refuse to discuss this "prisoner's dilemma" any further!
And if you insist on ignoring my future posts, then I will have no choice but ignore YOUR future posts as well. You MUST and WILL be held accountable for your inaction!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 8:51 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 12:25 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 188 of 300 (182081)
01-31-2005 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by Brad McFall
01-31-2005 12:25 PM


? ?
I think you meant to say French vs. Italian. But no matter, at least you WERE somewhat close. But I didn't mean YOUR glasses; I meant HERS!
To your BEING so confused about my other-threadly post that you pointed out, well, I apologize but HAD you not flabbergastingly blurted out in YOUR other-threadly post # 34, I never would have thought OF saying that! I TRIED to skip it, but COULDN'T! Do you now see HOW one simple post on this board can come back to ruin your life, even after you thought it was LONG forgotten? (just like phone calls). You are now suffering the consequences alone, and I can't help you, sorry. I predict you could even lose your court case because of this, NOT because of that RABIES thing like your girlfriend keeps mentioning! But doesn't mean it's ok to play with wild possums unless you're a professional (which I know you're not).
And to your:
McFall writes:
...yes I am a bit emotional about this and that is how I DID NOT HANDLE it...
NO! Don't do it Brad! Don't blame yourself for this! There is NO possible other way you could NOT have handled it, despite the multitude of available options! But it's NOT your FAULT! You need to seek immediate medical help for your suspected case of cysticercosis and everything WILL get better! Despite what president Clinton told you, brain cells DO NOT regenerate; you HAVE no TIME to LOSE!!
And to your:
McFall writes:
...I think GOULD conflated the seperation of kinds from the genetics of a grade and that my Christian friend IS but a "grade" on a school paper NOT the flesh that is needed to see this word was mistaught at such a fine elite insitution as Cornell. It is not "fine"...
Yes, we're on the same page with that one. Except for the totally stratospheric part, of course.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 12:25 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 7:39 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 300 (182183)
01-31-2005 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by Brad McFall
01-31-2005 7:39 PM


...
Brad, I love it. I just can't keep this up anymore (too strenuous) and I can't do it like I used to anymore anyway (over-40 syndrome, I guess). But I concede to you once again, bro. YOU ARE STILL the MASTER!!! Guess I'll always be the apprentice! WHEW!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Brad McFall, posted 01-31-2005 7:39 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Brad McFall, posted 02-01-2005 9:14 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 300 (182993)
02-04-2005 12:11 AM
Reply to: Message 199 by Brad McFall
02-01-2005 9:14 AM


hey,
Phil, uh, I mean McFall,
Check your email, dude. You're sleepin' on me again....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Brad McFall, posted 02-01-2005 9:14 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Brad McFall, posted 02-04-2005 9:40 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 228 of 300 (184037)
02-09-2005 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Brad McFall
02-04-2005 9:40 AM


Re: hey,
Brad,
Thanx for the email. Now you're making sense!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Brad McFall, posted 02-04-2005 9:40 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by Brad McFall, posted 02-09-2005 12:10 PM Juhrahnimo has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024