Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mt. Saint Helens now has it's own topic!
John
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 68 (17531)
09-16-2002 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by edge
09-16-2002 2:02 AM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by edge:
[B]
quote:
Originally posted by akakscase:
...I was curious as to why this happened so myself and a few other creationists got together and performed a rudementary test. We dug out a square archeologists box (50 ft by 50 ft) all the way to the bedrock (about 28 feet below our feet) mixed the dirt together and refilled the hole.
Things pretty slow up there, eh?[/quote]
You know.... I don't want to be a jerk, but I have dug a few hole in my life and this one is BIG!!!!! I have serious doubts as to the veracity of this tale. I mean, this is an area larger than the footprint of my house and twice and deep, including the roof.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by edge, posted 09-16-2002 2:02 AM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Quetzal, posted 09-16-2002 11:51 AM John has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 68 (17540)
09-16-2002 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Mammuthus
09-16-2002 12:02 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Mammuthus:
I'm surprised he did not find the holy handgranade of antioch
Nah... cause they found that in the Mt. Saint Helens mudflows next to Jesus' class ring -- the gem of which was C14 dated to precisely December 25, 0004. (Strangely the rest of the radio-carbon dates gave wildly inconsistent dates in the millions and hundreds of millions of years.)
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Mammuthus, posted 09-16-2002 12:02 PM Mammuthus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Quetzal, posted 09-17-2002 7:23 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 68 (17620)
09-17-2002 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Quetzal
09-17-2002 7:23 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Quetzal:
And if anyone's really bored, it'd be interesting to calculate how much gas was used up by a F-105 pickup truck back over a 50x50 ft section of mud 28,000 times...
I'm guessing my F-150 would burn somewhere around 300-400 gallons.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Quetzal, posted 09-17-2002 7:23 AM Quetzal has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 68 (17716)
09-18-2002 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by edge
09-18-2002 2:36 PM


quote:
Originally posted by edge:
Then when you're done, you've got a mess...
Nuttin' you couldn't clean up with a few buddies and a keg of beer(or two)
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by edge, posted 09-18-2002 2:36 PM edge has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024