Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Don't get it (Re: Ape to Man - where did the hair go?)
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 2 of 116 (96111)
03-30-2004 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by WiseMan
03-30-2004 7:52 PM


If we supposedly evolved from the ape, where did all of the ape-like hair go.
Absolutely nowhere. You have the same amount of skin hair follicles as an ape - man or woman.
It's just that the hairs are smaller, finer, and lighter. Especially if you're a woman.
Apes today don't seem to be evolving much
Well, their envronment isn't changing much, either. Anyway, how long have you been keeping track? Evolution's pretty slow, you know.
If you took a fish out of water, and threw it on the ground, would it magically sprout legs and start walking to "adapt."
Individuals don't adapt. Populations do. Is this a distinction you can understand?
No one could have lived long enough.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Will someone clear me up on the subject because it's too confusing to me.
Yeah. You're obviously laboring under some pretty steep misconceptions. Why don't you try asking honest questions in a genuine spirit of inquiry instead of trying to play Stump the Chumps?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by WiseMan, posted 03-30-2004 7:52 PM WiseMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by rineholdr, posted 04-28-2004 1:52 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 4 of 116 (96126)
03-30-2004 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by mike the wiz
03-30-2004 8:04 PM


Time is our enemy, what use would adaptations be unless you could have them when you need them?
Adaptation happens to populations, not to individuals. Why do I feel like I'm repeating myself? Oh, wait, I am.
You're born with all the adaptations you'll ever have. You don't get new ones after you're born. The adaptations come from mutations when you're concieved. They're not driven by environment, they're random. Then the environment selects among individuals to pick the ones with the best adaptations. The rest die, and the winners reproduce.
Fact is, losing all that ape-like hair is too risky for survival reasons, so I doubt we came from a common ancestor.
We didn't lose it! You have as many hair follicles as an ape. Man or woman, you have the same number of follicles.
Also, we would need to swing in the trees with nasty beasties with large teeth on the floor, so again I'm confused.
How many trees do you think there are on the African steppe, where humanity evolved?
Fact is there are lots of apes and monkeys surviving fine so why would we have needed to evolve in the first place?
How many ape species do you see on the African steppe these days?
It was that transition to the new envrionment - one of flat, rolling terrain and tall grasses, not trees - that drove the evolution of the human body plan.
It's like you guys are thinking totally backwards on this. How do you guys come up with this stuff?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by mike the wiz, posted 03-30-2004 8:04 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 6:22 AM crashfrog has replied
 Message 29 by pbaylis, posted 04-27-2004 11:15 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 30 by pbaylis, posted 04-27-2004 11:16 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 10 of 116 (96256)
03-31-2004 6:35 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 6:22 AM


I'm talking more about when changes are needed immediately in order to survive - well, evolution happens slowly.
The fact that sometimes changes are needed immediately for a species to survive is why the fossil record is largely one of extinction. When the environment changes beyond a species' ability to adapt, extinction is the result.
Or do you mean that they moved from a tree habitat to such a place?
Yes, exactly. That migration probably started the evolution of the human body plan.
Well, I mean - if we inquire and find that there is an answer to the questions then isn't that a good thing?
Yeah, it's good, but sometimes you ask questions in such a way that it's not clear how you've arrived at the misunderstanding. Like, if we were talking about Christianity, and I asked "if Christianity is true, then how do you explain the fact that Buddha beat Jesus in a street fight?" you might be very justified in wondering just where the hell I was getting my information about Christianity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 6:22 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 6:49 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 12 of 116 (96264)
03-31-2004 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 6:49 AM


My thoughts were, that because of the culling process (of information) - we wouldn't be able to get the hair back.
Boy oh boy, do you need to see my back. Whenever I start to doubt that humans and gorillas share a common ancestor, I just take my shirt off and look in the mirror. (The mental image you should be getting is "Sasquatch.")
You could probably get the hair back. I'm not really familiar with the genetic basis for hair but I doubt it would take more than a few crucial control genes to make your normal mammalian hair thicker and darker. Of course, why would you want to?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 6:49 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM crashfrog has replied
 Message 14 by Dr Jack, posted 03-31-2004 8:09 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 23 of 116 (96419)
03-31-2004 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 8:02 AM


I read something about Natural Selection that says if you lose the information then you can't get it back.
Yeah, but it's not a forgone conclusion that it would take a destructive mutation to cause thin hair.
For instance it could be that, like skin color, having a certain number of gene repetitions controls hair thinness - more of a certain gene, thicker hair. Just like two light-colored people could have a dark-colored child, you could have much, much thicker hair than either of your parents.
Like I said, though, I'm not familiar enough with the genetics of hair to say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM mike the wiz has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 28 of 116 (96449)
03-31-2004 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Gary
03-31-2004 6:04 PM


I don't think this is true. Walking stick insects have evolved and lost wings several times, though the process took millions of years.
But in that case, the wings they got back weren't the wings they had, as I recall, so I think Mike is still mostly correct.
There's nothing that would prevent the regaining of lost information. But it would be only as likely to happen as it was for that organism to gain that information the first time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Gary, posted 03-31-2004 6:04 PM Gary has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 59 of 116 (103150)
04-27-2004 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by pbaylis
04-27-2004 11:16 AM


Hair follicles does not equal hair!
I'm sorry, did I say it did?
Nonetheless, every hair has exactly one hair follicle, so it's hard to see your point. Not every follicle has a hair, obviously, or the same thickness of hair.
Science, after all these years and with all that combined intelligence still cannot explain why man lost his hair.
What the fuck are you talking about? Science just explained it. Humans adapted to places where they didn't need hair. Then they moved to places where it was so cold they needed clothing.
Sticking your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes lest you learn something about the world isn't going to make you too popular around here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by pbaylis, posted 04-27-2004 11:16 AM pbaylis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by pbaylis, posted 04-27-2004 9:13 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 85 of 116 (103276)
04-28-2004 1:24 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by pbaylis
04-27-2004 10:28 PM


Only elite runners even TRY to run 100K per day. It is not statistically worth considering from an evolutionary or adaptational standpoint.
How do you think those elite runners got that way?
Oh, I don't know - just a guess, here - maybe by running?
Primitive man spends a lot less time on his ass in front of the computer, if you get my drift. We've developed a sedentary lifestyle and the bodies to match, but relatively few of us couldn't make the change - couldn't be what you refer to as "elite" - if all of a sudden, our lives depended on it.
Oh, and one more thing - it would help us all stay on topic if you could pick a position and outline it clearly. As it is now your only position appears to be "whatever you say, that's wrong."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by pbaylis, posted 04-27-2004 10:28 PM pbaylis has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 88 of 116 (103288)
04-28-2004 2:00 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by pbaylis
04-28-2004 1:47 AM


If it was evolutionary, it is very surprising. Current theories just don't cut it.
To the contrary, it was asked and answered:
Humans live in places where apes do not; i.e. places where hair is disadvantageous. Moreover, we didn't lose the hair, it's just that the individual hairs became smaller, finer, softer, and lighter.
You tried to rebut this with something along the lines of "hair follicles aren't hair." This nonsensical reply doesn't even begin to represent an intelligent response, but when asked to expand, you resorted to insults and quote-mining instead.
So the point still stands.
Looks like you need something constructive to do.
Hrm, I think I'll stick with the points you have yet to rebut, thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by pbaylis, posted 04-28-2004 1:47 AM pbaylis has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 98 of 116 (103480)
04-28-2004 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by rineholdr
04-28-2004 1:52 PM


he just asked the questions...just wanted someone to help him understand.
That's exactly the opposite of what he wanted, and it's clear from his post. What he wanted was to try to trap evolutionists in some kind of gotcha, and set up his personal incredulity as some kind of scientific obstacle.
If I was terse it was deliberate, in order to shock him out of his smug confidence that evolution was about to fall to such a simple question.
I don't particularly feel the need to be civil to people who aren't respectful. Nor do I feel that my intelligence has anything to fear from your impression of it. Moreover, if it turns out that I was wrong, and that the OP was simply an honest question with unfortunate wording, I'm more than ready to apologize.
Now, did you have an argument? Did you care to address the substance of my posts, instead of just the style?
[This message has been edited by crashfrog, 04-28-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by rineholdr, posted 04-28-2004 1:52 PM rineholdr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024