Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   changes in modern man
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 69 (418984)
08-31-2007 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Refpunk
08-31-2007 10:59 AM


Re: Response to off-topic comment
That means that the Bedouins in the Middle east and the people in areas of the world who do nothing but stay at home and have sex with each other are more fit than anyone else in the world.
Yeah, that's the definition of being fit.
That argument is not only LUDICROUS AND JUDGMENTAL, but unbelievably ignorant as well.
Care to explain why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Refpunk, posted 08-31-2007 10:59 AM Refpunk has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 69 (418991)
08-31-2007 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Refpunk
08-31-2007 11:19 AM


Re: Response to off-topic comment
By your reasoning, then a fit parent who had 10 children and 3 of them die in a car accident, that makes the parent unfit.
Nope. You need to read the definition of fit. <--click

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Refpunk, posted 08-31-2007 11:19 AM Refpunk has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 69 (418994)
08-31-2007 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Refpunk
08-31-2007 11:32 AM


Re: Response to off-topic comment
So you're saying that couples who opt not to have children are less fit than those who do nothing but have sex all day and breed children?
Yes, by definition.
You couldn't be further from the truth.
Why? What is the truth? You haven't explained why its wrong, only asserted that it is.
Again, not only is that judgmental but your criteria for judging fitness is LUST AND LAZINESS.
No, the criteria is number of offspring.
One cannot carry on a rational conversation with people who make such false, judgmental, and ludicrous claims such as these.
Again, instead of just saying something is false, EXPLAIN WHY IT IS FALSE!!!
I therefore will not stoop to this level of conversation with anyone because they're not capable of thinking rationally.
Well, you seem to not be capable of evidincing your assertions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Refpunk, posted 08-31-2007 11:32 AM Refpunk has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024