Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   a poison for anti-evolution ID theorists
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 91 of 95 (61268)
10-16-2003 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Warren
10-16-2003 1:56 PM


Re: Testable ID hypotheses
The process of thought that Gene also wants to use as evidence is the "it's a code similar to those constructed by intelligence" argument. The only problem with this argument is:
1. The codes used for the inference are created by natural creatures (Humans) by natural methods. No supernatural code has ever been found.
2. Therefore, DNA code can only be inferred as being created by natural forces, not supernatural. It asks the question of who designed the first designer without anything to produce the first designer.
As many IDists ask: "Provide evidence of a code arising from natural causes," they still haven't supplied the proof of a supernatural code arising in the natural world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Warren, posted 10-16-2003 1:56 PM Warren has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024