I was saying that you or anyone else for that matter, don't understand anything at all when it comes to the deep questions. You have zero knowledge, which is very evident by the complete and total lack of evidence to support your assertion that existence is natural and does not require a God.
Lead us, oh enlightened one! (Not another one!)
Arguments from ignorance don't go well with 'existence' because ignorance is ALL there is with regards to these questions. You are simply not aware that you are very ignorant, because you've raised a model of the universe that you somehow believe is true.
(Unlike yourself?)
That's really not different to believing in the Bible or the Toorah. Atheists and creationist share the same non-sensical dogma that you somehow understand the Universe. You don't! Claims to the contrary don't do justice to your position and are tremendously hilarious.
Sorry to have to tell you this, but you are preaching.
You have presented no evidence here, just opinion based on religious belief. Religious belief comes at a dime a dozen, as there are some 4,300 different world religions. There are even some 40,000 different sects, denominations, and flavors of Christianity!
And not one of those can show that it is right and the others are wrong using empirical evidence. Otherwise there would not be so many thousands of different beliefs!
Further, religious belief has a very poor track record against scientific investigation. Those "gaps" are getting few and far between, and narrower.
Now, about those deep questions: What makes
you think that
you have the TRVTH and everyone else has/is "zero knowledge," "total lack of evidence," "ignorance," "very ignorant," "non-sensical (sic) dogma," and are "tremendously hilarious?"
This brings to mind a line from an article I read many years ago:
Save us, dear Lord, from those who would save us.
Art Hoppe, On the Death of Robert Kennedy
San Francisco Chronicle, 1968
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.