Hi,
The topic about an argument for or against the existence of God, but rather if Intelligent Design contains the basic requirements of a scientific hypothesis, regardless of wether God exists or not.
So you two could stop throwing one-liners and try to get back on topic a bit more. The issue of past scientists could be continued, but from the point of view of wether they were scientifically justified to posit God as an explanation at the point they did it. Was it a simple ''God-did-it'' or a more refined logical and psychological process ? How does this relate to the original post on the proposed scientific/unscientific nature of ID ?
Edited by AdminSlev, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
