I see you've got a lot of thing wrong here, unfortunately thi sin't really the thread to talk about them (this one should be a bout star formation) I'll see if I can give you some answers, ut it would be best to take these individual things to the threads they belong to, or start new threads to discuss them.
xavierkress writes:
Can we deny in any true evidence that God did not create everything and then once created set things into motion to act in it's own accord?
No, but why should we consider something for which there is no evidence.
Define FSM please as I haven't heard the acronym before.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster, the deity that Hooah thinks is responsible for creating everything.
Just because God put things into motion doesn't mean He just sits there and doesn't do anything now.
Got any evidence of god working within his creation at this point in time?
There are plenty of prophecies within the Bible that have come true...
Actually, no there aren't. This is a lie often told by apologists. Sadly for them, it takes a lot of twisting of the prophecies to make them fit, and even then it's not convincing.
...and none so far that have proven to be false.
Actually, there are plenty. How about Jesus' prophecy that "not a generation shall pass" till the events he described would occur. There's been plenty of generations since then, it hasn't occurred yet. Or the prophecy about Tyre? Tyre is still there, you know.
Archeologists have gone out to disprove the Bible only to find they are unable...
Actually, there's absolutely no evidence that archaeologists have found for, say, the Exodus, or the flood. This has led them to conclude it idn't happen.
...and usually come back believers in the Bible.
Another one of those lies told by apologists. This is also simply not true.
Must explain a bit more here. Isn't that what the primodial soup theory is about? out of this soup man formed after several generations of other forms were created until we arrived at this one?
That's not what the bible says happened though, is it?
And what's the ratio of probabilities say of first two human's being developed at the same time of opposite sexes and perfectly developed to meet the needs of the other to reproduce?
This shows you know very little about biology/evolution. There's no sudden marker where what was born and called "homo sapiens" was so utterly different from it's mother/father that it couldn't reproduce with it's parent species anymore. Evolution is all about gradual change. Your kids can reproduce with other kids can't they? And so on for generation upon generation. But look back 100.000 generations, and your kids won't be able to reproduce with that generation. That's how speciation works. There are no sudden transitions.
A few tips: Use the "peek" button on the lower right side of this post to see how I made those neat quoteboxes.
And if you want to continue this discussion I suggest either proposing a new topic, or finding existing ones to talk about them. This topic should be about star formation and god's role in it. We like to keep things fairly on topic in this forum.
Oh, and welcome to EvC!
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning