Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Star formation
Flyer75
Member (Idle past 2453 days)
Posts: 242
From: Dayton, OH
Joined: 02-15-2010


Message 4 of 39 (556325)
04-19-2010 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by killinghurts
04-18-2010 11:20 PM


Would you not agree though killing that evolution needs no supernatural intervention for the formation of anything???
The explanation a creationist is going to give you for star formation is the same explanation we (they) will give you for everything else in life, that being God created it initially and now nature runs it's course. Plant formation, the birth of animals and humans, ect...all created originally by God and now running it's natural birth/death course in life. I don't see the hangup for creationists in the star formation scenario.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by killinghurts, posted 04-18-2010 11:20 PM killinghurts has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Huntard, posted 04-19-2010 8:06 AM Flyer75 has replied

  
Flyer75
Member (Idle past 2453 days)
Posts: 242
From: Dayton, OH
Joined: 02-15-2010


Message 6 of 39 (556331)
04-19-2010 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Huntard
04-19-2010 8:06 AM


Huntard writes:
Also a possible explanation. That it's happening naturally now does not mean the "originals" formed naturally as well. Of course, there's no evidence for this, and everything points to the exact opposite, but this is the faith and belief forum, so I guess this one counts.
All I'm doing is simply addressing the OP question of if a star can form naturally, where is the need for a God and supernatural creation. I'm just saying, for the creationist, it's simple, maybe not "provable" but simple, God formed the stars, set them in motion and now they form and die on a natural basis, like everything else around us.
I'm not advocating that anyone here has to believe this but the OP wants answers (from creationists it appears) as for the need for a supernatural beginning to stars. I'm applying his question to everything out there, evolution included...why just mention the formation of stars???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Huntard, posted 04-19-2010 8:06 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Huntard, posted 04-19-2010 8:53 AM Flyer75 has replied

  
Flyer75
Member (Idle past 2453 days)
Posts: 242
From: Dayton, OH
Joined: 02-15-2010


Message 8 of 39 (556335)
04-19-2010 9:04 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Huntard
04-19-2010 8:53 AM


Ahhh...I see. I guess we'll have to wait for the OP to weigh in and see if he has more to add.
I had understood that you agreed with my second point, I just wanted to clarify that using his premise, we can apply a creationist perspective to everything, even evolution, for the theistic evolutionists or gap theorists out there.
Thanks for the clarification Huntard.
Take care

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Huntard, posted 04-19-2010 8:53 AM Huntard has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by killinghurts, posted 04-19-2010 11:34 PM Flyer75 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024