Hi crashfrog,
Agreed. Again - I'm just saying, nobody knows enough to come to any kind of conclusion, and we should not leap to conclusions that are going to make us look tremendously stupid later on. I'm trying hard not to, myself.
Yes, the default position, whenever there is insufficient empirical evidence, is that we don't know enough to reach a valid conclusion.
Also note that the relevance of these charges against Assange to the truth of the revelations are ... non-existant, and that using them to attack wikileaks is the
ad hominem logical fallacy.
Enjoy.
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)