shadow71 writes:
That I read and discuss views by scientist that challenge the "THEORY' really bothers you doesn't it Manny?
Well be prepared there are many more scientific papers coming out that are seriously challenging the Atheistic view of evolution, which states, there cannot be anything but nature that is driving the Universe.
Isn't science the study of nature? Or to the Pantheist, isn't science the study of nature and God?
Will these purported 'papers' be published in ArchivX, Pubsci, Nature, Science, or any other peer-reviewed journal, be it online or print. Would they even be published in Discover or National Geographic? Or is it World Weakly Daily?
Also, as usual, I agree with jar, there is no 'atheistic' view of evolution, there is only evolution. Change over time is a fact. Change over time due to natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and a few more I don't have at the tip of my finger is a theory as well established as relativity or gravity, meaning it has a huge amount of evidence compared to any blatantly and obviously anti-enlightenment objection.
Perhaps you should spend some time learning outside of various authoritarian entities, be they some home schooling cult or any other anti-human system and actually learn something about science,
all major religions,
and the humanities.
Edited by anglagard, : title and emphasis
The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen
™ Version 4.2
