I notice that you came back and deleted your reply, and I had hoped that meant you realized that the quotations you have been putting out were simply false. From your continued posts though it appears that you do not yet realize how totally refuted your sources are.
You had inserted a quote, IIRC from the Discovery Institute and used that to say that none of the examples in
Message 16 were information.
The error so many folk, particularly Christians make, is that they simply accept crap on authority and do not test it against reality. The ID proponents count on that trait, but in this case let's test the images in
Message 16 against reality and see if they do contain information.
Look at
this picture.
Is there information in that object?
Well, it is a slice out of a tree. So first piece of information is that it is a from a tree.
The color is too white to be pine, too light to be hickory and so may be Ash. Second piece of information, the tree was likely Ash.
I note a series of concentric circles, alternating bands of light and dark. Third piece of information, it shows regular seasonal growth rings.
I note though that the thickness of the light and dark bands varies from ring to ring, some bands being larger than those adjacent. Fourth piece of information, the tree grew better some seasons than in others.
Fifth piece of information is that the differences in growth indicate that the weather during the trees life varied, some years being better for growth with a longer growing season or more favorable conditions than others.
The FACT is that the people you quote have been, and continue to be refuted.
Information can be created by unintelligent, natural processes.
Intelligent Design is simply a scam. Its proponents count on two traits in their audience, ignorance and a blind acceptance of authority.
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion