dogrelata writes:
On what do they base these conclusions? Mostly loads of hard evidence gathered over many years of painstaking research. Does this evidence offer all the answers? Of course not. Is there still more to be learned? Of course there is. Will the conclusions that are reached when more evidence is gathered be the same as it is today? We have no idea.
There are no easy answers. A lot of very hard work has gone into gathering the knowledge we have today. A lot more still has to be done, along with very large helpings of patience and an acceptance that most of us will go to our graves knowing only a fraction of what we’d like to know.
But if the alternative is, “if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, then it’s a duck”, then I’m going to take the tough option every time.
But all of the above can be said of the Biblical model. It also involves gathering data, corroborating the evidences, exploration, logic, experience, observation of effects on cultures, etc.
As with your model, the unknown faith aspects of the varied hypotheses are supported by the corroborated evidences and gathered info. We've debated a few of these evidences in the threads over time and there's more. Our faith is by no means blind.
dogrelata writes:
nobody is allowed to point out the shortcomings or inconsistencies inherent within the inferences.
Not so. We debate these alledgements regularly in the threads.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.