Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religious Right and Evangelicals
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5094 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 3 of 50 (334542)
07-23-2006 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by macaroniandcheese
07-22-2006 6:34 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
I'm not sure what you are interested in discussing. But I did read the article and was fascinated by the book, I will probably pick it up in a few days.
What I found curious was the portion that talked about the initial reason for the formation of the religious right. That when the US government attempted to revoke Bob Jones Universities tax exempt status because of its discrimination policies is what pulled the trigger in forming the movement.
It would be interesting to me to consider what was such a threat about Bob Jones University and tax exampt status revoked. Did they see it as some sort of domino affect that might expand to include all religious affiliated orginizations? Or did they see it as an attack on Christianity itself because its attacking a university that is producing fresh evanglicals that will help promote false biological information and other important things important to creationism and associated biblical thoughts?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-22-2006 6:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 3:53 PM Discreet Label has replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5094 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 5 of 50 (334545)
07-23-2006 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 3:53 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Creationism (tm) is older then now anyways. They had the tm variation created as at least as early as the Scopes Trial I would think. Williams Jennings Bryan (president runner up as well as the most powerful political/religious leader of the time) supported the Bible over the science.
I mean Creatioism (tm) was not as sophisticated back then, and probably hadn't developed the kind of resources like AiG or ignorrant books. But it was in its beginning phase where it was using solely the Bible over canned/false arguements that are used now a days.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 3:53 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 4:05 PM Discreet Label has replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5094 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 7 of 50 (334551)
07-23-2006 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 4:05 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Well recommended information was that I also look into Henry Morris.
He appears to be pointed at as the father of the modern variation of Creationism (tm). Which however, also led me to George McCready Price, a canadian creationist. Price was apparently fundamental in the creation of Morris's viewpoint on flood geology. Price's literature was also fundamental piece of information that Bryan used at the Scopes Trial. So there appears to be a great deal of history behind the American Creationist movement...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 4:05 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024