Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Felger Sounds Off on Internet Insanity
Diomedes
Member
Posts: 996
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


Message 4 of 96 (771222)
10-22-2015 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
10-22-2015 12:47 PM


I'm with Felger. If you're willing to play around with all the crappy hardware and software that the computer and Internet moguls make us stumble around with, and all the incredibly clumsy connections between them, then have fun. You're just empowering them and making a bad thing worse. Until we start punishing the people who sell this crap by not buying it, we're just going to get more of it. I have no smart phone. I have an iPad that I don't often use it's so braindead. Computers I can put up with.
Stile has somewhat already responded to this, but my suspicion is this is also another attempt to finally force the cable companies and providers into having 'a la carte' programming instead of charging everyone for ten trillion useless channels they will never watch. The cable companies have been using that model for decades. They offer new channels, which are often just replicas of existing channels (MTV2 anyone?) and then are justified into charging more for their services.
The consumer has been wanting a la carte programming for decades now, but the cable companies have been fighting that tooth and nail because they know it will cut into their bottom line. As always, a few stubborn executives would rather hold onto old business models because they are either too lazy or too stupid to adopt new ones.
I personally have cable AND streaming capabilities. But I certainly would prefer a subset cable set of channels to choose from. When it all comes down to it, I pretty much only navigate to about a dozen or so channels regularly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 10-22-2015 12:47 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 10-22-2015 2:55 PM Diomedes has replied

  
Diomedes
Member
Posts: 996
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


Message 7 of 96 (771233)
10-22-2015 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Percy
10-22-2015 2:55 PM


What I want is to skip past the current crappy present as managed by the current set of crappy tech "leaders" where we're being sold a load of crap and told it's smart when it's not. A lot of people really believe this stuff is smart - it isn't.
Stile mentioned that his TV has Netflix installed, which is really neat and a step in the right direction, but I bet he also has to occasionally reboot his TV and download updates, which is just more crap.
Gotcha. And I see your point of view. To be fair and to play a little devil's advocate, this technology is still somewhat in its infancy, which is why we are seeing less than stellar performance with the new 'apps' in SMART TVs.
I myself also have both a 'smart' TV and Blu Ray player. But as you are alluding to, they are somewhat clunky in their implementation. I wonder how much of this has to do with them attempting to support so many platforms with a common set of technologies and libraries. That will invariably cause apps to behave oddly depending on which platform they run on.
The other thing I noticed is the variance between the apps depending on which mechanism I am using to interact. I also have Netflix for example. When I access it via my computer, it has a specific look and feel. On my tablet, it behaves somewhat differently. Somewhat understandable given the different interface types, but I have seen odd behavior and discrepancies that don't seem justified given the capabilities of the technologies.
The funniest example though is how my Netflix behaves on my Smart TV vs my Smart Blu Ray player. Both of these are Samsung devices. They even have a common interface widget that is 'supposed' to be able to have them operate more effectively with each other. Yet ironically, the app for Netflix on the smart TV looks and operates completely differently from the Netflix app on the Blu Ray player. And there is really no accounting for 'why'. I've updated both to their most current version, yet they have totally different looks and feels. Makes no sense to me. Ultimately, it gives me the impression of what I have seen often at software companies: teams operating in silos and not collaborating effectively.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 10-22-2015 2:55 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Percy, posted 10-23-2015 8:29 AM Diomedes has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024