You are making the rather tenuous assumption that mate selection (for purposes of actual reproduction) will be based soley on overt physical features, rather that intelligence, or sufficient education to de-frock surgically created 'beauty'.
I just have to say my two bits on sexual selection in humans - creativity, not intelligence - is what was selected, intelligence is just a by-product. This is why Mick Jagger is sexy.
The other 'bit' is that "beauty" is an averaged condition: the most 'averaged' people are more beautiful.
Join the effort to unravel {AIDS\HIV} with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
™ Version 4.2
