My point, which I made in an oblique and possibly rude way, is that there's considerably more to evolution than fatal negative selection, the culling of the weak/diseased, etc. Sometimes that kind of selection is the first step. But the second step, in organisms that reproduce sexually, is finding someone to mate with you. We don't do that at random, so that's a selective - and evolutionary - influence.
However, an argument could be made that some of the pressure from sexual selection has been removed, as well. Just as selective pressure for good eye sight has diminished due to the invention of glasses, less sexually desirable people have a number of recently developed cosmetic options available. There are breast implants for women. It is possible to stretch leg bones for short men (a la Gattaca, although I doubt anyone has done this for cosmetic reasons).