What is a Strawman?

The theory of evolution says that all the monkeys turned into people.Since there are still monkeys around, the theory must be wrong.Therefore evolution is false.

In my example, the strawman was in the first line where I claim that the theory of evolution states that all monkeys turned into people. That is in fact false, the theory of evolution says no such thing. Therefore my argument which concludes that the theory of evolution is false because monkeys are still around is based on attacking something else that is NOT the real theory of evolution. It's attacking a strawman.Another example:Person A's position: Morals are subjective.
Person B's response: Person A doesn't have any morals! Therefore he/she is wrong.This is a combination fallacy of attacking a strawman, and ad hominem or attacking the person. It is not the case that Person A is without morals, it is simply the case that this Person A doesn't believe them to be objectively true. Furthermore, whether or not Person A has morals is irrelevant to the truth or falsity of Person A's actual claim.

Sorry Ned, but I guess I sorted doubted that Philip would actually follow through with a demonstration of his notion of the Strawman concept, andm so I opted to simply demonstrate plainly what a real strawman is.I know that it probably could have been a better learning experience for Philip if we had allowed him to trot out his erroneous conception of this fallacy and then ripped it to shreds, but it just seemed to me that the mere initiation of a thread dedicated to that end seems like a trap. I was betting that Philip would have been wise enough to dodge the thread rather than humiliating himself by laying his ignorance bare.