Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

The definition of science: What should it be?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The definition of science: What should it be?
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5550 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 49 of 100 (322602)
06-17-2006 2:49 PM 		Reply to: Message 46 by Rob
06-17-2006 12:55 PM

Re: Ontological vs methodological
Rob writes:
​
The onlything we should seek is the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That means science is not the tool...
That's a tall order. With such high standards you are very likely not to acomplish anything on life. What good is in that?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 12:55 PM Rob has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024