Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The definition of science: What should it be?
vitalprikalist
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 100 (319950)
06-10-2006 1:42 PM


Neither creation nor evolution is totally truly science. Neither can be totally proved, but each has its scientific support. Evolution has proof for microevolution, creation has proof for a young earth, and other things. both involve belief to accept. anything beyond microevolution, and anything that involves God creating the world. However neither is a religion. They are the basis for religions. Creationism is the basis for Islam, Christianity, ..., Etc. Evolution is the basis of atheism (yes-the BELIEF there is no God). Science should present the facts for both, and clearly state that both are thereis, and its your decision to make. Thats why either both should be taught or neither.

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Chiroptera, posted 06-10-2006 2:32 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 23 by lfen, posted 06-10-2006 2:56 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 06-10-2006 3:15 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 27 by PurpleYouko, posted 06-12-2006 9:43 AM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 28 by subbie, posted 06-12-2006 11:00 AM vitalprikalist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024