You are contradicting yourself. If the evidence fits two models, then we aren't discussing faith, but an argument over the what the evidence infers. If evidence is consistent with a model, then it isn't a religion, it is a hypothesis at least. Please try and keep your stories straight.
So be specific and point out where the creationist "POV" deals with why the 'Common Creator' created retroviral insertions in identical portions of the genome for chimps and humans. This claim, if it is scientific, should be testable, have confirming evidence and potentially be falsifiable and not already falsified.
Additionally, if the 'evidence' fits both 'theories' you should be able to identify specific evidence that would falsify either theory. The potential falsifications of evolution are quite clear. Identify the specific falsifications of creationism or ID.
Cheers,
Larry