I am certain that few would agree that what we are really discovering from input data available through only five senses is the iron frame of our own minds. Thinking. Thinking about these absolute abstractions will absolutely lead to understanding the "operating system" of our mind. Probably, though, not understand that which we abstractly examine with the dark closed intraneural black box in our skull.
Mathematicians might agree. Some of the best admit to the errie feeling that the "new" theorems which occur to them have resulted as "uncoveries" of the framework lattice of mathematics, rather than some invention of a way around problems. The math theoroms are already in their mind, hardwired. Finding the way the "program" works is the "enlightenment" of their discovery.
If they are correct, and if all we can ever do in science is limited by an Uncertainty Principle operating in our mind, then GUT has been mathematical formulated by and with Euler's Equation. That equation contains the five basic mathematical constants and is the foundation for all the mathematical language by which we understand and communicate our science.
Is this reasonable, or as far out as religion?
Gen. 1:26 And God, (The Universal Force, the Macrocosmos), said, "Let us, (the Natural Laws), make man, (a conscious mind, to model us, the Universe, as in a Microcosmos of his mind, in order that our image might be modeled after our own orderly organization): and let him (that conscious mind,) have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth."
Gen. 1:27 So God (The Universal Force) created man (an abstract mind in his own image, enabled to image The Universal Force, abstractly and mathematically), so created God (The Universal Force) him; male and female created he them.
™ Version 4.2
