Lucifer
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 134 of 245 (153206)
10-26-2004 11:41 PM
|
|
|
I do agree that Creationism can be taught as a religion course, but not under science. Creationism isn't a scientific theory, regardless of how much those Creationists want it to be, since it doesn't have any explained mechanisms, and no one that I know of has written an actual scientific report on Creationism and has had it subject to peer review. And people still need to get it through their heads that evolution does not explain the origin of life. I repeat: evolution does NOT explain the origin of life. It describes the history of life and its variation.
|
Lucifer
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 141 of 245 (153324)
10-27-2004 8:06 AM
|
|
|
Logically, I figured out Intelligent Designer couldn't possibly more scientific, since it demands the existence of some sort of Designer, yet, there has been no evidence of this. This is similar to supporting the evidence that a god does exist, but I haven't seen that yet. I don't know what the scientists say about mutation, but I think it would happen in the similar manner viruses infect organisms.
|