Christianity Is Broken, but Can Be Fixed

quote:

---

A slightly wild assertion mike. Its credentials historicity-wise appear to be excellent compared to some of the history we take for granted.

---

There are many Bible threads in which you can provide your verification for the historical accuracy of the Bible, so I suggest that you take them there.So far, nobody claiming that the Bible is historically accurate to any great degree has been able to support their assertions, so maybe you will be the first.

quote:

---

Mike claimed (first) that the bible is historically inaccurate. Will he be invited to take his claims to the appropriate thread too. Or is the presumption that the Bible-is-inaccurate-until-proved-otherwise, the AdminSchraf stance? If so and with respect, could AdminSchraf, in the appropriate place, inform me as to how this stance was arrived at?

---

It looked to this Mod as though your post had only to do with Biblical historical accuracy, in the broadest sense.Mikehager's post still had something to do with the OP, while yours did not.I wonder if you'd be a dear and just invite mike to an appropriate thread if you'd like to discuss the historical accuracy of the Bible. It'd just be better for this thread, don't you think?I promise, if mike continues to persue the topic here instead of following you, I'll have a word.(I am an off-topic offender, so I am trying to improve myslef by spotting it in threads as a moderator.)