The more Biblical claims that are shown to be true the more other claims are probably true. If prophecy is evidenced as true then these facts make creation claims more credible. This is why prophecy is denied with equal vigor as creation claims because once the supernatural is proven all of the other claims logically come with it.
No. Proof of the supernatural would not prove the story about the magic tree and the talking snake. This is why it is possible to believe one but not the other.
Evolution, on the other hand, that is common ancestry, is based on far-fetched extrapolation. In other words, "recent time" homology evidence, by extrapolation, is used to conclude for things millions of years ago. This is an invalid connection if there ever was one.
What the heck are you talking about?
. In fact, uniformitarianism is the ultimate "invalid connections between evidence and conclusions" doctrine.
Again, your babble seems to have no relevance to anything.
I suspect that this is because instead of attacking real science, of which you are ignorant, you are attacking an imaginary set of scientific doctrines that you've made up in your head. Your elliptical references to the nonsense in your head will not be understood by people who don't share your delusions.
™ Version 4.2
