Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My mind's in a knot... (Re: Who/what created God?)
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 112 of 156 (494127)
01-14-2009 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Agobot
01-14-2009 10:37 AM


Still... what's the big deal?
Agobot writes:
But that's a dangerous slope, you have to decide for yourself if you are ready to accept this, as it will change your life forever.
I still don't understand why you think all this is such a big deal.
Change my life forever how? Will I no longer need to eat, sleep or breathe? Will I be able to quit my job and live in peace no matter where I go with total disregard to what anyone else thinks?
If you are interested in this and your mind is in a perfect mental condition - go ahead, see for yourself both sides of the story.
Why would a mind need to be in perfect mental condition? What practical difference does any of this make?
Isn't a cloud of mathematical waves of possibilities, that talks, eats, walks, thinks, dreams, sings, falls in love, etc.... Supernatural?
And what is the big deal of redefining "natural" to be exactly this?
Or say we discover that everying is controlled by "magic" that follows the rules that an "overseer" types into a computer? This isn't a big deal either. I still need to eat, sleep and breathe. My life really isn't altered in any practial way whatsoever.
What "mind-blowing change" are you actually proposing to be possible?
I certainly agree it's fascinating, and interesting, and incredible. But I think your faith in the ability of humans to adapt is equally low if you think such knowledge would actually bring any significant portion of the population to tears.
If you simply have a problem with being wrong about certain assumptions you've made in your life about the existence of this reality... I don't really see why you think this is such a big issue.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Agobot, posted 01-14-2009 10:37 AM Agobot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Agobot, posted 01-14-2009 2:59 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied
 Message 115 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 01-14-2009 7:13 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 118 of 156 (494276)
01-15-2009 8:17 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Agobot
01-15-2009 6:55 AM


I find it interesting... for a new thread
I don't really see what this has to do with any advances in science, but it is something I'm rather interested in. Although it's not on topic here at all.
Agobot writes:
if we can't agree on a commonly accepted purpose of life past replication(all atheists agree replication is the only humanly known purpose of life), what else can we do?
I know such things have been discussed on this board before, but my limited searching prowess has turned up no focused results.
I've requested to start a new thread and you're welcome to join me if you're at all interested in such things.
The short answer to your question is that your underlying assumption couldn't be farther from the truth. All atheists most certainly do not agree that "replication is the only humanly known purpose of life."
Again, I don't want to draw away from your science discussion so if you'd like to delve deeper into this topic, feel free to join me in the other thread.
I'll post a link here if the new thread gets promoted.
As promised:
Message 1
Edited by Stile, : Linky Doodle went to town, a-riding on his Spider...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Agobot, posted 01-15-2009 6:55 AM Agobot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024