chinger
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 52 of 95 (50687)
08-15-2003 8:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by doctrbill
07-23-2003 11:42 AM
|
|
If the ages,such as adams 930 years, in the old testament were monthly revolutions instead of years,which makes a lot of sense,then the date of creation and noahs flood would be changed
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by doctrbill, posted 07-23-2003 11:42 AM | | doctrbill has replied |
|
chinger
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 55 of 95 (50743)
08-16-2003 9:10 PM
|
Reply to: Message 54 by doctrbill
08-16-2003 5:31 PM
|
|
Doctrbill already has the answer on that one ,i have been forced to accept that the hebrews were not very good with numbers,and it wasn't just the old testament,the new testament starts off with the same problems in matthew.
Fourteen generations from abraham to david,about 1000 years.
Fourteen generations from david to carrying away into babylon,about
280 years more or less.
Fourteen generations from carrying away into babylon to christ,about
720 years more or less.
I have done this from memory,but i think its pretty close,the math just does not work,this is not a good way to start off the new testament.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 54 by doctrbill, posted 08-16-2003 5:31 PM | | doctrbill has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2