Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Citing Middle Eastern Prophecy Being Fulfilled
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 103 of 131 (493054)
01-05-2009 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Buzsaw
12-14-2008 1:43 PM


Re: Mid East Prophecy/Latter Times
Regarding Edom, first you argue that Edom was in the wrong area to be regarded as ancestors of Palestinians. Now you're trying to claim that the Palestinians include the Philistines and other farther removed nations which are much farther from modern Palestinians than Edom. You reject Edom, adjacent/bordering and suggest instead, Palestinians and others, far removed.
I am at a computer away from home, but if you read scholarly works such as the Anchor Bible Dictionary (which I admit I havnt done in many months) and look at entries like Idumea (sp?), Nabateans , etc. then you will find that there was a great expansion of Arabian tribes around the period 600-550 BCE and that Edom was indirectly pressured to move west.The Edomites moved quite close to Jerusalem and infact became a large part of Philistia.
Almost all Edomites became Jewish (over time)by the time of Christ.There is some debate whether the Eomites were forced to become Jewish or whether they choose to do so without much imposition.
The Anchor Bible Dictioary refers to all sorts of scholarly debates in literally hundreds of publications (footnotes show them typically in German works but many in English as well).I have also read discussions of this issue in works written since 1992.Josephus even talks about some of these issues.
It seems to me that Edomites would be mixed in with modern Jews at least as much as anybody else, and many of the modern Arab peoples (Palestinian bedouins, Jordanians, etc.) could have much blood from the invading "Arab" tribes (I forget if they were north or south Arabian- but didnt you mentioned tribes like Dedan and Sheba, didnt you?) from the period after 600 BCE and which pressured Edom.
Many Jews were of Edomite descent and it is equally true that many Jews (of various backgrounds)thereafter were equally absorbed by many respective peoples of various backgrounds and in various lands.
Back to "prophecy"
I dobnt know what one can make if the historical situations(s!) from various time periods EVEN of one masters the respective historical background from each period.
I do know that the New Testament didnt say anything about any future conflicts between Jews and Edom or between Jews and any other semitic (or Persian) people.Nothing about "mother Russia" either. Or China.
Seems to me that the events 600-550 BCE were ancient history by the time of Christ.They werent the subject of eschatology discussions or predictions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 1:43 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 104 of 131 (493055)
01-05-2009 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Buzsaw
12-11-2008 12:23 AM


Re: Drift From Topic
Caldron, all anyone can do is guess when Job lived. That he is aware of the dinosaurs and that he lived long enough to have two families makes me believed he lived shortly after the flood.
Job has been the subject of many scholarly commentaries from north-west semitic scholars.Many books can be purchased which use the (Hebrew type)language of Job to help date the book.
There have been some interesting theories (William Albright oncementioned that he feels it was written by a north-Israelite after the fall in 721 , and promised to publish his details).Go to Amazon and look for keywords "JOB" and "COMMENTARY".The Anchor Bible Commentary was edited by Albright but he didnt write the commentary on Job.I havnt read it.
Anyway....
Nobody places the book anywhere near "the flood".
BTW, when was the flood? Abraham (if he existed, which conservative scholars tend to believe) can be easily placed at around 2000 BCE. But written records go back nearly 1000 years before that.Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization started 1000 years before then.
But the King James places the Tower of Babel and Great Flood just a few hundred years before.
Assuming there are geneological gaps then would you place Job around roughly 20,000 BCE since you said it was just after the flood? Or around Abrahams time?
What means do you have to date Job and what do you make of the date of the Hebrew dialect it used throughout?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Buzsaw, posted 12-11-2008 12:23 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 105 of 131 (493060)
01-05-2009 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Buzsaw
12-19-2008 9:34 AM


Re: Hard empirical evidence
The Middle Eastern ancient nations all have descendents in this area and Edom is no exception. Not only that, but named nations are prophesied to desolation relative to their treatment of Israel and again Edom is no exception.
Good grief! I have attempted to ignore all the absurd comments from Buz which claim that Islam wants "Israel" destroyed (Israel=Jews when refering to prophecy talk)
The Edomote nation (Idumea or whatever) vanished yet they were about the furthest thing from enemies of "Israel" that one can imagine.
During the middle ages 80% of Jews lived in Islamic lands (with complete freedom as opposed to the situation in fundi-Xtian Europe)) and Palestinian Jews fought alongside Musilims against fundamentlaist Christian invaders.
Odd that those same fundamentalist Christians have survived and thrived.Infact fully 99% of audio/video media (aside from the internet)in the USA (the world power) is run by Fundi-Xtians. (50 million+ right-wing radio listeners, 3 million Fox viewers,verses about 1 million PBS viewers or 500,000 MSNBC listeners).Heck we spend $715 billion per year on military spending mainly because of fundi-Christian voters and their crazed obsession with ensuring "prophecy" is fulfilled via making the Middle-east a complete mess.
Those same fundi Christians want 99% of all Jews to die (all but 144,000) by "1988" I mean "2000" I mean "2011-2018" (Van Imp's latest prediction.
The historic Jew-killers (European fundi-Christians) have thrived.
Their defenders (Muslims, Edomites, and Palestinians) have suffered.
Speaking of "Hard empirical evidence"....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Buzsaw, posted 12-19-2008 9:34 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Coyote, posted 02-21-2009 10:40 AM Nimrod has replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 106 of 131 (499912)
02-21-2009 10:35 AM


Im about to post alot on this topic
(still being edited)
I hope to create an engaging discussion among posters.
Im going to leave this post blank so I can come back and edit a table of contents type of post to keep things orderly.
ISSUE #1 (posts 212-213)
My first post(s) are going to cover the Jewish view of Ezekiel 35-40 during the period just after the Islamic Liberation of Palestine in 638 AD.
First I will lay a little historical groundwork.
(coming)
EDIT: I havnt had the time I needed today, but will try and get a little something done, but will have to finish another day.
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 12:53 PM Nimrod has not replied
 Message 113 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 2:53 PM Nimrod has not replied
 Message 114 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 5:38 PM Nimrod has not replied
 Message 115 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 7:53 PM Nimrod has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 108 of 131 (499920)
02-21-2009 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Coyote
02-21-2009 10:40 AM


Im not going to reply anymore till Im finished
But here
Jack Van Impe
Add 51.4 to 1967 when the Jews took Jerusalem and you come out to 2018....Add the extra six months because it happened in June of 67 and the 4/10ths and you come out to 2019 year and take away the seven from that and you come out to 2012.Could it be that on Christmas Day jesus Christ would come at that moment?
I cant get the old link to work but this was accessed jan 1 2007 at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f3aRnkgOWs
Also see.
NOTEdeleted link because its messed screen up (edited around 4 hours after post was made)
I ask you to please provide a substantive objection to my posts however.I really dont know how (or what exactly) to respond when you throw cheap and vague insults.
The world didnt end in 1988 when the "40 year generation" was the standard.
Then it became "2000-2005" once the standard was 1967.
Now we are up to a "51.4" year generation.
(As for statement about only 144,000 Jews surviving, that is a dispensationalist interpretation of Revelation.Tim LaHaye only thinks 2/3s of all Jews will die so I suppose nearly 5 million Jews are allowed to survive in his prophecy driven fantasy)
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Coyote, posted 02-21-2009 10:40 AM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Coyote, posted 02-21-2009 11:10 AM Nimrod has replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 110 of 131 (499929)
02-21-2009 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Coyote
02-21-2009 11:10 AM


Is the topic boring you?
Nobody is forcing you to use a URL which leads you to a discussion on the prophecy views of over 100 million Americans (ie dispensationalism).
It is also somewhat of a political discussion because dispensationalists arent mere spectators but they feel the need to drive prophecy toward its completion.
If you find a discussion-centered around a major force in our world today-boring then fine.
Good luck in pulling the gun from your head;I sure hope the trigger isnt pulled simply because you are leaving a topic you find boring.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Coyote, posted 02-21-2009 11:10 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 112 of 131 (499940)
02-21-2009 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Nimrod
02-21-2009 10:35 AM


Jews and Jerusalem before 638 AD
Jews were prevented from entering Jerusalem during the entire Christian period (post 300AD) until the Persians briefly took Jerusalem in 614.
The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land
Volume 3
Ephraim Stern ed.
The Israel Exploration Society & Carta, Jerusalem
Simon & Schuster
1993
698-804
p768
Michael Avi-Yonah
In the fifth century.... It seems that in the Early Byzantium period Jews still were prohibited from settling in Jerusalem...
Then, near the end of the Byzantium period, there is some possible evidence of a few Jews in Jerusalem.
ibid
Avi-Yonah
p768
...evidence of a small Jewish community in Jerusalem at this time, apparantly concentrated near the Temple Mount
Then on p 786 Meir Ben-Dov talks about the "Tumultuous events" of the early 7th century.
ibid
Meir Ben-Dov
p786
...in 614.The Persian invaders, supported by a Jewish auxiliary force from Galilee, broke into the city and slaughtered the Christian inhabitants...
....
After only 14 years, a large Byzantine army headed by the emperor Heraclius-whose army the Persians had routed in 614-invaded the Persian Empire and Persian-occupied territories, including Syria and palestine.In Febuary 628 Heraclius marched into Jerusalem.... again the city was to suffer acts of extreme violence
Jews were slaughtered by the Roman Christians just 14 years after Jews gained access via the Persians.
Here is some background to the 614 Persian/Jewish invasion
Biblical Archaeology Review
May/June 2004
Vol 30 No 3
p32
Eliat Mazar
Large quantities of ash found in some of the rooms are evidence of an intense fire.The monastery was probably destroyed during the Persian invasion of 614 C.E. We have two accounts about how the Persians conquered Jerusalem that conflict with one another.One account says that the city surrendered, but the surrender was followed by a Christian uprising that was harshly crushed.The second account says the Christians resisted and refused to surrender, as a result of which the Persians besieged the city, ultimately vanquishing the defenders.In either event, the city was destroyed.
The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land
op cit
786
Meir Ben-Dov
Only ten years later, Jerusalem changed hands once again, falling to the Muslim Arabs.In 638, Jerusalem was conquered by the Caliph Omar I, a newcomer from the Arabian desert, who managed within a few years to defeat the two exausted superpowers, Persia and the Byzantine Empire.Tradition has it that Omar himself, accompanied by his right-hand man Ka'b el Akhbar, a converted jew, visited the newly occupied city.... he did ascend the ruined Temple Mount.
Biblical Archaeology Review
Nov/Dec 1995
vol 21 no 6
p37
Dan Bahat
During the Byzantine period (fourth-seventh century C.E.), Christian rulers had made the Church of the Holy Sepulchre the religious focus of the city.They had left the Temple Mount, site of the destroyed Jewish Temple, a garbage heap to make a point.After the Arab conquest, the focus of sanctity once again turned to the Temple Mount, this time, however, crowned not with the Jewish Temple, but with the Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque
For more details, see post 140 in the link below.
http://EvC Forum: Is the bible the word of God or men? -->EvC Forum: Is the bible the word of God or men?
Jews were allowed to return and they, along with Christians, outnumbered Muslims till the first successful Crusade in 1099.
After 638, Bahat mentions in the 1993 NEAEHL (vol 3. p 786 and yes he authored both the encyclopedia text and BAR article)that the Christian character of Jerusalem didnt change overnight "However with the coming of Muslim imigrants and the conversions that followed the Arab conquest, the proportion of Christians in the population fell steadily".
He commented on the 1099 situation once European Christians took the city.
BAR
ibid
p44
In 1099, members of the Jewish community in Jerusalem were murdered or driven out by the Crusaders.After the final defeat of the Crusaders in 1244, Jewish life was restablished in Jerusalem.
Speaking of the Jewish people, Time-life books says
Library Of Nations
ISRAEL
Time-Life Books
1987
pp54-55
The catalyst for their misfortunes was an edict proclaimed by the Emperor Constantine in 313 A.D., which made Christianity effectively the state religion.
....
Within a few years of Constantine's edict, a mass of discriminatory laws were passed, stripping Jews of land and civil rights, and forcing them out of the mainstream of the economy.Soon synagogue-burning became rife, and at the beginning of the fifth century, in Alexandria, Jews suffered their first full-scale massacre.
....
The other great world-conquering religion of the first millennium was kinder to Jews....Islam....Palestine itself was conquered in 638 A.D.
The empires Arab rulers... not only allowed them to practice their religion without interference, but also freed them from the economic and cultural restrictions that had been imposed on them under Christianity.As a result, Jews were permitted to settle once more in Jerusalem, while returning exiles were given the right to reclaim the land.
Islam reached Spain in 711 A.D., creating a hospitable environment for the Jews already settled there.... a rich Hispano-Judaic culture flourished.... Jewish scholarship made the University of Cordoba the greatest center of learning in Europe.
The lessons of coexistence offered by the Islamic lands were not lost on the more perceptive rulers of the Christian west...
....
A period of relative calm and and stability ensued for European Jewry.It was abruptly shattered in 1096, when France and other Western European countries launched a Crusade to liberate Palestine from the Muslim infidels.Since the intention was to kill nonbelievers, many Christian warriors decided to start with the nearest Jews, so that the route to the Holy land became littered with Jewish corpses.
And when, in 1099, the Crusaders eventually conquered Jerusalem, they marked their victory by the murder of every non-Christian in the city.The only surviving Jews were herded into a synagogue and burned alive.
By the time the Muslims recaptured the Holy land in 1291, anti-Semitism was endemic throughout Europe.
I forgot the page number (below) but will edit it in later
World Book Encyclopedia
J-K
1988
Jews
....After about 1000, Spain , which was then a Muslim nation, became one of the great centers of Jewish scholarship.The period from about 1000 to 1300 in Spain is known as the Golden Age of Jewish history...
....
Religious persecution of the Jews increased during the Middle Ages, when the Christian Church became the most powerful force in Europe
....
During the 1200s and 1300s, almost all the Jews of England and France were driven out of those countries...
England in 1290, France in 1394 and when Christians ended 700 years of Islamic rule in Spain , Jews were expelled (with Muslims) in 1492.
A speech by Pope Urban II on November 18, 1095 lead to the Crusades.
Biblical Archaeology Review
Jan/Feb 2006
Adrian Boas
52-53
The reaction to Urban's speech was immediate and overwhelming.... At first it was the simple people, the peasant surfs, who anwsered the popes call.This initial reaction became known as the Peasants' Crusade.... From the spring of 1096, they crossed Central and Eastern Europe towards constantinople, but they never reached the Holy land.The Peasants' Crusade is remembered chiefly for the bloodthirsty acts of persecution and murder ... on Jewish communities in France and Germany.The pope had spoken of fighting the unbelievers.The leaders of this Crusade believed they were carrying out the pope's wishes by attacking the Jews.
....
The massacres began at worms and spread to Mainz, where the Jewish community was annihilated.Attacks also took place at Speyer, Trier, Metz and Cologne.
That is the background.
Now I will quote Jews from the time just after 638 AD. (next)
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 10:35 AM Nimrod has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 113 of 131 (499948)
02-21-2009 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Nimrod
02-21-2009 10:35 AM


Jewish views on Palestine/Edom/Gog
I will only quote extremely select parts from a great book: Jerusalem by F.E. Peters with a dedication "For Moshe and Bertha Barasch of Jerusalem Who deserve well of that glorious place".
It covers many quotes from Jerusalem period by period.
I will only cover a few quotes from the early Islamic period, and they will be only select parts(roughly 1/10 of a text will be quoted).There are more writings I could quote but wont.
First a few lines from a apocalyptic poem.
here is a tiny part of the intro by Peters
Jerusalem
F.E. Peters
Princeton University
p192
...provided an apolyptic vision of what it was like when the Arabs, here as often the "Ishmaelites", suddenly descended on the Holy City in the seventh century .... the references are sufficiently clear-to the Byzantines or Romans as "Edomites", for example- to enable us to date it very close to AD 638:
Here are some lines (the book has it in italics)from the roughly 30 line poem.
ibid.
p192-193
On that day when the Messiah, son of David will come
....
Gog and Magog will invite one another
And Kindle fear in the heart of the gentiles
And Israel will be freed of all their sins
....
Edomites and Ishmael will fight in the valley of Acre
Israel will go forth...
....
And their Messiah will be revealed
A Karaite Jew, Salman ben Yeruham said this (below) from about 950 said...
I will substitute "{" and "}" for "[" and "]" and remember that the text is in italics in the book.
ibid
p193
As it is known, Jerusalem remained under the rule of the Rum {Byzantines} for more than 500 years, during which they {the Jews} were not able to enter Jerusalem.Anyone who was discovered entering was killed.When by the mercy of the God of Israel... Ishmael {Arabs} appeared, the Jews were granted permission to enter and reside there
Next is a a quote of a rabbinic sage from around 750 BCE named Simon ben Yohai
(first quick commentary from Peters)
Jerusalem
F.E. Peters
Princeton University
p199
Once Jewish apocalyptic poem has already been cited in connection with the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem.There is another.... probably dates from around ...750...
The Jewish text
ibid
p199
When he saw the kingdom of Ishmael {the Arabs} that was coming, he {Simon} began to say "was it not enough what the wicked kingdom of Edom {Rome/Byzantium} did to us, but must we have the kingdom of Ishmael too?" At once (the angelic priest ) Metatron .... anwsered and said "...the Holy One, blessed be he, only brings the kingdom of Ishmael in order to save you from this wickedness (of Edom).He raises up over them a Prophet {Muhammad} according to his will and will conquer the land for them and they will restore it in greatness, and there will be great terror between them and the sons of Esau."Rabbi Siman anwsered and said "How do we know that they are our salvation?"He anwsered "Did not the prophet Isaiah say {21:13}, that he saw a troop with horsemen in pairs, etc. Why did he put the troop of asses before the troop of camels, when he need only have said:'a troop of camels and a troop of asses'? But when he goes forth riding a camel the dominion will arise through the rider on an ass.Again a 'troop of asses' since he rides on an ass, shows that they are the salvation of Israel, like the salvation of the rider on an ass {i.e., the Messiah}"...
....
The second king who arrises from Ishmael {Mu'awiya} will be a lover of Israel, he restores the breaches.... of the Temple.He hears Mount Moriah and makes it all straight and builds a mosque there on the Temple rock .... he makes was against the sons of Esau and kills his armies...
The 7th century Jews took a spiritual interpretation of Ezekial.The Western Christians were "Edom" and Ishmael/Arabs initiated an apocalyptic set of events which led to the return to Jerusalem of Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple.
If there was yet any future prophecy ("future" as in post-biblical times)in the Biblical texts , then the 7th century CLEARLY was the time.
I have said as much in debates with dispensationalists
See post my post 60 in link below and IamJosephs responce in post 62.
See the exchange between Buz and myself from posts 77 to 90 in the same link. Post 88 is the post where I think I spell it out very clearly.
http://EvC Forum: fulfilled prophecy - specific examples. -->EvC Forum: fulfilled prophecy - specific examples.
Now, I want to call attention to a fantastic 13 page article in BAR by Moshe Sharon.
He starts out by pointing out that every major city of Syria except Caesarea opened its gates to the Muslims around 638 C.E. including Jerusalem.Jerusalem could have easily held off the Muslims but the Christian patriarch surrendered to a "minor" Arabian officer.He points out that most Arab sources skip the anti-climactic details.
Biblical Archaeology Review
July/August 2006
Islam on The Temple mount
Moshe Sharon
p44
Many years ago I proposed that the Dome of the Rock was built by the early Muslims to symbolize the renewal of the Temple....Similarly, early Jewish midrash, though composed some 60 years after the building of the Dome of the Rock, hails the Muslims as the initiators of Israel's redemption and praises one Muslim ruler as the builder of the "House of the Lord".
A very elaborate Islamic tradition describes the Dome of the Rock as the Solomonic Temple.This tradition appears in the collection of traditions belonging to the literary genre known as "praises of Jerusalem" complied in the 11th century...
The compiler of the tradition was Islamic scholar al-Wasiti, a resident of Jerusalem.Sharon says he went into great detail about the various reasons for building the Dome of the Rock.He describes Hebrew prayers, that Muslims used though he himself doesnt know the translation, and Jewish rituals
Sharon mentions...
ibid
p68
For the Jews, on the other hand, the Umayyad caliph who built the Dome of the Rock was the one "who repairs the breaches of the temple".For them, the Muslim occupation was the beginning of redemption.
It is ironic that the Temple has already been rebuilt and the Jews have already been able to return for 1300 years.The "Old City" was roughly 45% of Jerusalems land area since the days of Solomon and most of its population lived there.There were only 1500 Jews during Solomons time in all of Jerusalem.There were more Jews in the Old City from 638 C.E.-1948 C.E. than during the entire time of Solomon except during crusader times.
There were more Jews in the Old City (ie historic "Jerusalem") 300 years ago than there are today.
Christians gained religious freedom for the first time ever in 638 CE.
If there was a prophetic event then 638 CE was it.It was a good year to be a freedom loving Christin or a Jew.A groundbreaking year that signaled a new era.
Edom was defeated.
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 10:35 AM Nimrod has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 114 of 131 (499971)
02-21-2009 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Nimrod
02-21-2009 10:35 AM


I want to address the racial element in dispensationalism
The "prophecy" we hear about by fundi's comes from dispensationalism which started with John Nelson Darby c1800 CE.Everybody knows he invented the "rapture" but Darby himself said that he never could have invented the rapture doctrine untile he "discovered" that "Israel" was NOT the body of Christians as orthodox Christians (or any Christian up till his time) have always believed , but actually a race which is distinct from the church.Hence, racial descendants of ancient Israel, especially Judah (ie Jews), have a prophetic plan which does not depend on faith (i.e. they dont need to be Christian) but rather is based on the "unconditional" covenant God made with Abraham c2000BCE.The powerful element in prophecy is a return to the land based on Old Testament prophecies which Darby felt were yet to be fulfilled.The tribulation was yet future and Christians would be spared since the prophecies dont, according to Darby, refer to the church but infact relate to "Israel".
Christians will be raptured.
"Israel" (essentially non-Christian Jews)will face 7 years of tribulation.
Dispensationalists make it very clear that God always keeps his promises and thus he will not forget the promise he made to his old friend Abraham 4000 years ago.That is the Abrahamic Covenant.A right to Palestine.An "unconditional" deal God made with the chosen race.No matter what modern-day Jews believe or dont believe (such as a complete rejection of Christ), they have complete rights to their ancient land based on their (unique I suppose?)bloodline.
In my next series of posts,I intend to show that the racial argument-which dispensationalism is based on-doesnt work.I will not cover what the Bible actually says in these posts(perhaps later), instead I will assume for the sake of argument that the New Testament actually teaches of an "Israel" based on race in post-Christ times.I will assume for the sake of argument that the dispensationalist interpretation of the New Testament is correct.
I will close this post with quotes of leading dispensationalists such as Tim LaHaye and Chuck Missler.Actually, I will save Missler for later(its a dandy-trust me!)
Charting the End Times
Tim LaHaye & Thomas Ice
Eugene,Or: harvest House,2001
p46
Jacob had 12 sons, who becamse the heads of the 12 tribes of Israel.They began the Jewish nation, and since then the human race has been divided into Jews and Gentiles.
The key is not DNA but actually direct ancestry.Jacob and Esau (Edom) were brothers but its the children of Jacob who have the rights that the Abrahamic covenant dictates.
LaHaye also said this about the Israelite race.
The Beginning of the End
Wheaton:Tyndale
1972
Tim LaHaye
As a student of human temperment for many years, I have been intrigued by the Jewish temperment.After carefully analyzing the temperment of the first Israelite as he is described in the Bible, I have found Jacob to be a "dead ringer" for the twentieth-century residents of Israel.
Clearly direct ancestry is fundamental to dispensationalist "prophecy".
A racial argument in every way.
But are the racial lines the same today as they were 4000 or 3000 even 2500 years ago? (I will address the geographic argument in a few days-and I intend to make excessive use of quotes from dispensationalists at that time; I have many dispensationalists tapes,books, and such and will hammer every last detail of Ezekiel 35:1-39 and the confused arguments dispensationalists make THEN I will compare everything to the archaeological, historical and geographical situation).
But first, the racial argument...
(anwser coming in the next post or 2)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 10:35 AM Nimrod has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 115 of 131 (499992)
02-21-2009 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Nimrod
02-21-2009 10:35 AM


First the early Greek period and Edom/Idumea
This period post-dates the Old testament.(post 330 BCE)
I will cover the Edomites after they took 2/3s of Judah and mainly were centered in the Negev and to a lesser extent in the southern highland region.
I will quote from Lester Grabbe as he seems to be the authority on the 2nd Temple history of the Jewish people.
(I forget if this is volume 1 or 2, I have these quotes written on paper and am away from my library)
Judaism From Cyrus to Hadrian
(vol. 2 ?)
Augsburg Fortress
1992
Lester Grabbe
p.329
Beyond statements in the Old testament and some archaeological information, we know little about the Idumeans (Edomites)or the various Arab tribes before the Greek period(see 2.3.5.4 for information on them during the Persian period).... It is during the Maccabean Period that the Idumeans are frequently mentioned.They made up one of the "surrounding nations" which harrassed the rebel Jewish state under Judas and against which he fought, taking hebron and Marisa (1 Macc 5:3, 65-68;5.4.4).We then skip forward to the reign of John Hyrcanus and a strange episode, the conversion of the Idumeans to Judaism:
He next quotes Josephus in Ant.
Josephus
Hyrcanus... after subduing all the Idumaeans, permitted them to remain in their country so long as they had themselves circumcised and were willing to observe all the law of the Jews.And so, out of attachment to the land of their fathers, they submitted to circumcision and to making their manner of life conform in all other respects to that of the Jews.And from that time on they have continued to be Jews.
So, now a once pagan people that came to inhabit most of Judah also believe the same as Judah.Are they Jews? Are they Edomites? The entire world would say they are "Jews", unless you happen to be a dispensationalist.I wish I could get a good anwser from dispensationalists.
But,that aside (for now), lets get back to the history ...
(keep in mind that an elipsis with 4 dots "...." between sentences means that I could literally be skipping 95% of a paragraph, and often I am;infact a 3 dotted elipsis actually skips a *hugh* amount of information in one case)
Judaism From Cyrus to Hadrian
Grabbe op. cit.
p329
this is puzzling, not so much because of what was done by the Hasmoneans-they were trying to clear the borders of expanded Judah from idolatry- but because the effects of the conversion lasted.Forced conversion does not usually represent a change of mind, and, if possible those compelled carry on their original religion covertly and revert to it openly as soon as they can.This did not happen with the Idumeans.Although we know of the occasional individual who intended to return to the ancestral religion (e.g. Costoborus...), the Idumeans as a whole supported the Jews in their later wars with the Romans.For example, in the "war of Varus" (ca. 4 B.C.E.)Idumea revolted along with Jerusalem.... Attested in even greater detail is the participation of several thousand Idumeans in the defense of Jerusalem during the 66-70 war...
My next quotation will skip a ton of details.
ibid
330
Why did the conversion of the Idumeans succeed? Kasher (*46-77) has dealt with the question at length (drawing on the work of a number of predecessors, which is avaliable only in Hebrew)....he covers most of the important issues.His conclusion is that the Idumeans assimilated to Judaism voluntarily, perhaps by agreement between Hyrcanus and the Idumean leadership.... conversion may have been forced on some.Nevertheless, that the Idumeans retained their Judaism is strong evidence that the conversion was more or less voluntarily and did not represent a major change for most inhabitants of the area.Not all the following points are from Kasher, but he has further discussion on most of them.
1.The Idumeans normally practiced circumcision, so enforced circumcision would have been irrelevent for most of them (apart from, perhaps, a few Hellenized Idumeans who had forgone the traditional rite).
2.Strabo says nothing about forced conversion but only that the Idumeans "joined the Judeans, and shared in the same customs with them" (Geog. 15.2.34). (See below for a similar statement about the Itureans, which suggests for both cases not a compulsion by force but an agreed adoption)
3.It may be that some Jews had always lived in Idumea and influenced the Edomites who settled there.It seems that there was considerable Jewish influence-from whatever source-long before the activities of Hyrcanus I.
4.Josephus's source for his statement that hyrcanus compelled the Idumeans to accept circumcision was likely Nicolaus of Damascus.As a non-Jew and no particular friend of the Hasmoneans, Nicolaus may have interpreted the event-however achieved- in a negative way, as done under compulsion.
Kasher also argues that Hellenistic urbanization intensified under the Selucids after Antiochus IV and that the Idumeans felt hostility to this, which would have speeded up the assimilation process.The cogency of this argument is debatable; at least it needs further support...
These historians really amaze me at their depth of study on so many hundreds of issues.Perhaps,dispensationalists can devote the same amount of attention to areas important to their theories (superficiality is the hallmark of dispensationalists "scholarship").
Grabbe goes on to talk about an ethnic Arabian tribe (Itureans) which also converted to Judaism.Here is what Josephus says:
Ant 13:11.3
Josephus
He compelled the inhabitants, if they wished to remain in their country, to be circumcised and live in accordance with the laws of the Jews
In a few days I will cover much more accounts of conversions of pagans to Judaism and Jewish converts to Christianity and such.
Here is Grabbs informed opinion:
Lester Grabb
op. cit.
Josephus, however, also quotes as his source Timagenes , who gives a slightly different version "This man ... brought over to them a portion of the Ituraean nation, whom he joined to them by the band of circumcision." Thus the original source does not suggest compulsion.One must also keep in mind that the Itureans involved were those in Galilee, which had been predominately in jewish hands since the Persian period(*Kasher 80-83).In sum, the conversion of these Itureans... seems to have been similar to that of the Idumeans and not primarily under compulsion.
Lets move forward and learn more about the most important Idumea.
Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy land
edited by Avraham Negev and Shimon Gibson
Continuum 2001
IDUMEA
240-241
...In the early Hellenistic period Marissa (*Mareshah) became its capital.During the reign of the Selucids Idumea was enlarged to include the district of Ashdod (Josephus,Antiq. XII, 308)After the death of Antiochus VII (129 BC)John Hyrcanus subdued the Idumeans and converted them to Judaism by force.During the reign of Alexander Jannaeus, grandfather of Herod, was appointed ruler over this district.After the conquest of Palestine by Pompey in 64 B.C. the western part of Idumea, centered around Marissa, was detached from Judah.Only in 40 B.C. was it returned to Herod by order of Augustus.After Herod's death the district was in the territory of Archelaus, Herod's eldest son, and from AD 41 it formed part of the kingdom of Agrippa I.After the destruction of the Second Temple it became part of the Provincia Judea and was under the direct control of the Legio X Fretensis.The southern part of that region formed part of the *Limes Palestinae. In AD 200 the whole region of Idumea was given to the newly founded polis of Eleutheropolis. (See also *Beth Gubrin)
ibid.
315-316
MARESHAH (TELL); MARISSA; SANDAHANNAH (TELL)A town in the territory of Judah (Josh.15:44).... Rehoboam converted Mareshah into a Judean stronghold... (2 Chro. 11:8,11).During the first half of the 9th century BC Zerah the Ethopian attacked Judah, was defeated by Asa at Mareshah and was pursued as far as Gerar (2 Chr. 14:8-15).In the division of Judah into 12 districts (recorded in Joshua 15 but dating to the time of Jehoshaphat), Mareshah, together with *Keilah, *Achzib, and nine other towns formed one district.
The town was conquered by Sennacherib in 701 B.C. Although the biblical text does not provide a detailed list of towns (2 Kgs. 18:13), Micah's lamentation over the destruction of the towns in the Plain refers to this campaign and does mention Mareshah (Mic. 1:15).After 586 BC it fell to Idumea.In the papryri of Zenon, an Egyptian official of the 3rd century B.C., it is mentioned as a center of the slave trade with *Egypt.At that time, there was a large colony of Sidonians at mareshah....From the book of Maccabees and from Josephus' account it is evident that marissa was the largest and most important city of *Idumea.A decline set in after its conquest by Hyrcanus in the last third of the 2nd century B.C. (Josephus; Antiq XIV, 257).Although it was freed by Pompey in 63 B.C. (Josephus, Antiq.XIV, 75) and rebuilt by Gabinius in 57 B.C. (Josephus,Antiq XIV ,88), it did not recover.During its conquest by the Parthians in 40 B.C. (Josephus, Antiq. XIV, 364), it was completely destroyed and was never afterwards resettled,its role being taken over by *Beth Gubrin (Eleutheeropolis).
....
NEW EXCAVATIOS Since 1989 work has been undertaken at the site by A. Kloner of the Israel Antiquities Authority.
We will take a close look at Kloners work at Marissa in a few days.
But quickly,the site that is about a half-mile away:
ibid
78-79
BETH GUBRIN; ELEUTHERPOLIS
....
Its first bishop participated in the Council of Nicaea in AD 325....In the southern part called daroma, several Jewish settlements survived until the late 4th century AD.
After the Arab conquest settlement of the city, known then as Jibrin, continued.
....
...New excavations by A. Kloner since 1992...
We havnt even scratched the surface of what is about to be covered at Beth Guvrin (in other works).Ill continue in a few days. (still editing post, I didnt get crap done today it seems...)
Ill just leave people with an interesting note so far.Imaging if you went back to say 1000 BCE and then looked at the two-thirds of Judah which later became Idumea. Now fast forward to the start of the Common Era (AD 1) 1000 years later.You would see "Jews" in both cases.But there would be quite a biological difference.And it isnt just Judah where that is true.Israel too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Nimrod, posted 02-21-2009 10:35 AM Nimrod has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 02-27-2009 11:44 PM Nimrod has replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 127 of 131 (508079)
05-10-2009 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Buzsaw
02-27-2009 11:44 PM


Nimrod Derailing The Thread
Nimrod, you're muddying up this thread with a lot of detail which is not relevant to the topic. What you need to do if you want to refute the prophecies I've cited is to address the specifics of the prophecies I've itemized by copy and pasting them one by one and showing your stuff relative to each. If you want to go into all this detail I suggest you start your own thread and do your thing.
Well,since I have about 100 times more to cover, I will perhaps need to start a new thread(in a few days).But I will come back HERE to re-paste some of the stuff just to see your (non?)responce.
But let me show you how my posts were 100% ON-topic.
I showed that Edomites fought to their last drop of blood defending Jews.
You claimed they would be enemies of Jews in a future time beyond the 6th century BCE.
I showed that Muslims have been amazing friends to Jews while (non-Semitic)Christians have only killed them.I showed that the last recorded "prophecy" to the Jewish people spoke of God (YHWH)raising the "Prophet" (Gods words!)Muhammed so Jews would return and see the Temple rebuilt.
You spoke of Arabs and Islam as enemies to Jews. (btw I have quotes from leading dispensationalists admitting that Ezekiel 38 SPECIFICALLY states that Arabs will NOT be involved in fighting the battle! Several prophecy scholars have admitted that.)
I have shown that Edomites converted to Judaism and began to show that they remained Jews.
Yet your prophecy scenario requires two distinct Edomite/Judaic peoples in the 1940s AD if the prophecies (35:1-36:15) refer to 1948.
I will also drop a bomb (several actually) on you later as well. I will quote dispensationalists who say that Ezekiel 35-37 requires an empty land.They feel the 1900's AD fit that description.
I will show population statistics which show that the lowest point in population for Palestine since circa 2000 BCE was the period just after 587/582 BCE and it lasted till Jews started to return in 522 BCE. (population was still fairly sparse for over 100 years.)
The population for ALL of Palestine (c580-c520 BCE) dropped to perhaps less than 20,000 though it was over 100,000 at 600 BCE and over 200,000 in the 8th century BCE.
Yet in 1893 AD, there were 466,000 Arabs and 60,000 Jews in Palestine.1800's Palestine was just as dense as the USA was in 1945 AD.Palestine was as dense in 1914 as the USA was till about 1973.
Palestine has NEVER been less dense than the United States in the last 2000 years.
The land was not desolate except in the 6th century BCE. Ezekiel wrote no later than about 560 BCE (Ezekiel dates it exactly, but I forget the exact dates at the moment)and mainly wrote in the 570s BCE and even critical scholars generally agree with the dates presented.
I will show you even more hard-hitting facts which you will ignore and claim are off topic. (but in my own thread save some I will paste here later)
Edited by Nimrod, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 02-27-2009 11:44 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Nimrod
Member (Idle past 4945 days)
Posts: 277
Joined: 06-22-2006


Message 128 of 131 (508087)
05-10-2009 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Buzsaw
02-27-2009 11:44 PM


Re: Nimrod Derailing The Thread
Nimrod, you're muddying up this thread with a lot of detail which is not relevant to the topic. What you need to do if you want to refute the prophecies I've cited is to address the specifics of the prophecies I've itemized by copy and pasting them one by one and showing your stuff relative to each. If you want to go into all this detail I suggest you start your own thread and do your thing.
Here Buz is the LAST prophecy that I know of that God gave to the Jews.
Nistarot de-Rabbi Shim'on Bar Yohay
see Adolph Jellinek, ed. , Bet Ha-Midrasch (Leipzig, 1853), vol. 3, p. 79
Here is a more accessible translation.
Jerusalem
F. E. Peters
p199
When he saw the kingdom of Ishmael {the Arabs} that was coming, he {Simon} began to say "was it not enough what the wicked kingdom of Edom {Rome/Byzantium} did to us, but must we have the kingdom of Ishmael too?" At once (the angelic priest ) Metatron .... anwsered and said "...the Holy One, blessed be he, only brings the kingdom of Ishmael in order to save you from this wickedness (of Edom).He raises up over them a Prophet {Muhammad} according to his will and will conquer the land for them and they will restore it in greatness, and there will be great terror between them and the sons of Esau."Rabbi Siman anwsered and said "How do we know that they are our salvation?"He anwsered "Did not the prophet Isaiah say {21:13}, that he saw a troop with horsemen in pairs, etc. Why did he put the troop of asses before the troop of camels, when he need only have said:'a troop of camels and a troop of asses'? But when he goes forth riding a camel the dominion will arise through the rider on an ass.Again a 'troop of asses' since he rides on an ass, shows that they are the salvation of Israel, like the salvation of the rider on an ass {i.e., the Messiah}"...
....
The second king who arrises from Ishmael {Mu'awiya} will be a lover of Israel, he restores the breaches.... of the Temple.He hears Mount Moriah and makes it all straight and builds a mosque there on the Temple rock .... he makes was against the sons of Esau and kills his armies...
Not only did Christ not mention anything about Arab wars with Jews...
Not only did Ezekial fail to mention Arabs fighting Jews(or better put he specifically said Arabs would NOT be fighting, Ezekiel only mentioned Turkey, Sudan, and Iran fighting but Turkey was the main enemy with the other two just tagging along)...
But Gods last prophecy (I think the prophecy dates to around 628-638 A.D. but scholars place it around 750 A.D.)to the Jews talked of Arabs freeing Jews from the enemy from the north (in Turkey!)we know as the Byzantine empire.
Amazing that you simply ignore that as if it is off "topic".
I think the Biblical prophecies were fulfilled around the 6th century BCE but at least I am honest enough to consider the 7th century AD as a possible fulfillment of prophecy (I should consider all avaliable evidence and I advise you to do the same)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 02-27-2009 11:44 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024