MACROevolution vs MICROevolution - what is it?

We already went through this with humans, and you had to admit that human genetic diversity could not be produced through this mechanism.

You claimed that there could only be 2 alleles for any human gene. We showed you genes that have thousands of alleles (e.g. HLA genes) which can only be the product of mutation.

Adding new genetic material is what mutation does. The mutation has to be there in order to be selected for. Yes, the selection of new mutations which increased genetic diversity. It is just like adding more fuel to the gas tank of a car so that it keeps going down the road. Just as you lose gas from a gas tank as you go down the road, but that tank is replenished by adding gas to the gas tank. This is how you are able to travel farther than one tank will allow.

Yes, selection of new mutations that increase genetic diversity. Every offspring they produce has mutations their parents didn't have.

In our analogy, you are saying that driving another foot destroys the purpose of driving to the spot you were previously at.

It does. The millions of different alleles for homologous genes seen among beetle populations were produced by mutations. Yet more stuff you are making up. And here you said that selection reduces genetic diversity. You have just pointed to an example that destroys your argument. Each person only has 2 alleles out of the thousands of alleles for some HLA genes. Then how do we have thousands of alleles for these genes?

So just like the gas tank of a car, the engine removes gas while the gas pump adds gas. This is why evolution never stops.

There are no such species in nature as the peppered moth and pocket mouse demonstrate.

What you are saying is contradicted by observed facts. Species do change through time due to mutations. The peppered moth and the pocket mouse are two examples. We can even look at transitional hominids that change through time. You are simply living in a fantasy world.

Name one. I am unaware of any fossil species from the Cambrian that is completely unchanged since the Cambrian.

Then how did you determine that species never change? We are talking about evolution, which occurs over millions of years. Then show us how not a single mutation has changed one individual in those species. Until you do so, you are just blowing steam. We already demonstrated that mutations cause change. You are just wrong.

You have been answering the questions with made up fantasies which we have demonstrated are made up fantasies.

Corrupted? Is the human genome a corrupted version of the chimp genome simply because there are differences? But they aren't interbreeding which is why the alleles diverge. It isn't a matter of if they can interbreed, but if they do interbreed. For all we know, humans and chimps can produce offspring, but what is important is that we don't.What we have is macroevolution produced by the accumulation of microevolutionary events in each lineage.

Do you have any science to back up this assertion?Are the differences between the chimp and human genomes a loss in information?

And mutations replenish that genetic diversity.