Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Is 'genetic determinism' empirically valid, and is it essential to the "Modern Synth
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 30 of 49 (444685)
12-30-2007 11:39 AM


An observation
The OP uses the expression "direct, immediate and compelling efficient cause." That's a seriously outdated notion, inconsistent with what we know from modern science (or even from classical Newtonian science).
As best I can tell, the thread originator is trying to demonstrate what can be proved from faulty premises (i.e. premises based on that outdated notion of causation). The responders are not accepting the faulty premises.
The overall result is that people are talking past one another. No real discussion is going on.
Edited by nwr, : spelling

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024