david12
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 40 of 304 (247111)
09-28-2005 10:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 6 by Chiroptera 09-20-2005 11:05 AM
|
|
Alright, this is the way I see it. Creation is a FAITH as well as SCIENTIFIC theory. Evolution is solely a SCIENTIFIC theory. Meaning, the only thing evolution leans on is science. So, if you cannot find fossils that show the transition of species, then there is a big hole. I am really interested, because everyone that has posted here as commented (like the original thread starter said not to) about different opinions, and alluding to the fact that there is no significant fossil evidence to prove macroevolution. I do not want someone commentating on what Im saying, I WANT A FACT. because science is all about facts right?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 6 by Chiroptera, posted 09-20-2005 11:05 AM | | Chiroptera has replied |
|
david12
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 46 of 304 (247149)
09-29-2005 12:01 AM
|
Reply to: Message 45 by RAZD 09-28-2005 11:51 PM
|
|
I am not debating that there is evolution within a species, as Darwin proved. But after the discovery of evolution within a species Darwin just ASSUMED that since there is evolution within a species, that there COULD be evolution between species. where is that evidence? Where is the hard evidence of a creature in between ape and man.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 45 by RAZD, posted 09-28-2005 11:51 PM | | RAZD has replied |
|