The evidence for a old earth is not as overwhelming as it looks.
Others have already pointed out that it's actually
more overwhelming that it looks. I just thought I'd add that it was
deeply committed Bible-believing Christians who grudgingly came to the conclusions that the Earth is old and there was no global flood, before Darwin wrote any of his works. They came to those conclusions because
the evidence for an old Earth and no global flood was overwhelming, even in the late 1700's and early 1800's when these geologists lived and worked. Since then we have examined hundreds of times
more evidence, and
all of it indicates that the Earth is old and there was no global flood.
Creationists have found
no evidence for a young Earth outside of their peculiar interpretations of the Bible. They have found one or two things that aren't fully explained yet, and might indicate an old Earth or a young Earth. Don't bet your life savings on that evidence indicating a young Earth when the chips are down.
It's truly sad that you think that parroting claims from unreliable and prejudiced websites is discussion. You obviously know nothing about the subject and have not even thought about the subject; you just swallow whatever AIG feeds you.