My question is posed to those who attempt by use of science to support creationism of any kind, be it YEC, theistic evolution, or intelligent direction. How can the shifting standards of proof inherent in such a position be justified?
If God is the Creator then how could science contradict the existence of a Creator ?
My question to atheists is: Why do you use science to support atheism ?
The inability to deduce ID is explained in the Bible as a penalty from God for deliberately and summarily rejecting Him as the ultimate Creator.
Instead, atheists use science to imply that fossils and such evidence-against the Creator of Genesis, when in fact the evidence says no such thing but only the interpretation of the worldview is speaking = philosophic conclusion made under the disguise of scientific enquiry.
WT