Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evolution calculations
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 10 of 92 (183903)
02-08-2005 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Parasomnium
02-08-2005 9:38 AM


Re: Mathematical proof?
If I provided a mathmatical model that proved cows can fly or that proved that birds could not, would it have value?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Parasomnium, posted 02-08-2005 9:38 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Parasomnium, posted 02-08-2005 10:37 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 28 of 92 (184012)
02-08-2005 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Loudmouth
02-08-2005 5:29 PM


There's a question I've been wanting to ask that goes to the issue of "Use of Language".
One quote that's come up here is...
i saw that research which determined that the mutation rate in humans is 175 neutral mutations, 3 deleterious, and a few beneficial.
With your background and grounding in math, can you tell me which is larger, 3 or a few?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Loudmouth, posted 02-08-2005 5:29 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Loudmouth, posted 02-09-2005 1:31 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 33 of 92 (184109)
02-09-2005 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Loudmouth
02-09-2005 1:31 PM


It gets even more interesting. Can you point out where in the full text or abstract of the linked article it even mentions beneficial mutations?
From the content of the linked article how can we determine how many beneficial mutations there were?
The statement made
i saw that research which determined that the mutation rate in humans is 175 neutral mutations, 3 deleterious, and a few beneficial.
is frankly, false and misleading on several levels.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Loudmouth, posted 02-09-2005 1:31 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by pink sasquatch, posted 02-09-2005 2:27 PM jar has replied
 Message 45 by Saddleback, posted 02-09-2005 6:54 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 35 of 92 (184120)
02-09-2005 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by pink sasquatch
02-09-2005 2:27 PM


Re: why deleterious?
Agreed, It goes back to the question I asked in Message 10.
Calculations and formulas are fascinating and lovely to look at, but they are not reality. Nothing in either the abstract or full text of the article dealt with what is as opposed to what is estimated.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by pink sasquatch, posted 02-09-2005 2:27 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 49 of 92 (184207)
02-09-2005 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Saddleback
02-09-2005 6:54 PM


Re: Cited research on Benefical Mutations
There is little incentive to convince a Creationist and by Creationist I mean those who support a direct creation of humans. For the most part, it is a unrewarding task. In the second place it's impossible.
Creationists really consist of two distinct and seperate groups. There are the liars, those that head up AIG or ICR, for example, or the televangelists like Jim Bakker, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Pat Robertson, Oral Roberts, Gene Scott or the folk at TBN. They know that what they are teaching is false but have an economic incentive in continuing to lie to the second group.
The second group are the gullible. They have been sold a line of goods by the Snake Oil salesmen hawking Creationism from the rear of Medicine Wagons. They will eventually evolve on their own to one of two positions. They will decide the on their own to really look at the evidence or continue buying from the Medice Wagon. Eitherway, the it will be something they do on their own, it cannot be driven from outside.
The idea of a calculation to show evolution possible is simply stupid. Evolution happened. It's a fact.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Saddleback, posted 02-09-2005 6:54 PM Saddleback has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Saddleback, posted 02-09-2005 7:41 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 52 of 92 (184224)
02-09-2005 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Saddleback
02-09-2005 7:41 PM


Re: Cited research on Benefical Mutations
However, I would encourage you to be careful about making too quick a categorization lest your categories become your reality, and not reality itself.
Ah, the Map is not the Territory.
So true.
Finally, your moniker, "Aslan is not a tame lion." It is clearly a reference to the Christian fiction book "Chronicles of Narnia." It seems like a very Christian moniker for a conclusion. Especially about His untameability. Indeed, Christ/Aslan was/is not tame!
Well, I tend to think I'm a very Christian person. But what does that have to do with the absurdity of Creationism?
The thread is on evolution calculations. If you look at what I posted in Message 10 you will see why I believe such tasks are simply stupid.
We know Evolution happened. The evidence is simply overwhelming. We have a theory, the TOE which has done a remarkable job explaining how it happened. In 150+ years of testing, not only has it withstood all challenges, ever new development has confirmed it. The TOE is an extremely well supported theory.
To return to the idea of mathmatical models, one that shows evolution possible would be as functional as one that shows birds can fly. We can determine that birds fly by observation regardless of the model.
On the otherhand, and that show evolution impossible have about as much validity as one that showed cows can fly or that birds can't. We can determine the facts of either of those propositions through the same act of observation. Cows can't and birds can, regardless of the model.
So it is with Evolution. The facts, the evidence is there.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Saddleback, posted 02-09-2005 7:41 PM Saddleback has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Saddleback, posted 02-11-2005 6:47 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 69 of 92 (184448)
02-10-2005 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Parasomnium
02-10-2005 5:25 PM


Re: Robin
Yeah but you're much better looking than she is.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Parasomnium, posted 02-10-2005 5:25 PM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Parasomnium, posted 02-10-2005 5:51 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 77 of 92 (184648)
02-11-2005 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Saddleback
02-11-2005 6:47 PM


Re: Cited research on Benefical Mutations
I've seen birds fly. I've never seen a creature or a population evolve.
Wow. Then this will be an exciting time for you. Stick around and you'll find many examples of evolution including within the Primates like you and me and chimps. But it has nothing to do with this thread.
But new DNA sequences are nearly impossible for man to maniuplate and create using all his intelligence and tools into something useful.
Kinda off the wall assertion there. Also has nothing to do with the topic. If you have ANY evidence of that please start a thread on the subject.
You just assume it happens by some concept called "chance."
Nonsense. I KNOW evolution happened because of the evidence. But that's not what this topic is about. Let's stick to the topic.
What does it mean to you to be "very Christian"?
Glad to discuss that with you in an appropriate thread but it is totaly off topic here.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Saddleback, posted 02-11-2005 6:47 PM Saddleback has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 89 of 92 (185104)
02-14-2005 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by RAZD
02-14-2005 7:26 AM


Read fine in Adobe Reader 6 here.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by RAZD, posted 02-14-2005 7:26 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by RAZD, posted 02-14-2005 8:42 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024