However, I would encourage you to be careful about making too quick a categorization lest your categories become your reality, and not reality itself.
Ah, the Map is not the Territory.
So true.
Finally, your moniker, "Aslan is not a tame lion." It is clearly a reference to the Christian fiction book "Chronicles of Narnia." It seems like a very Christian moniker for a conclusion. Especially about His untameability. Indeed, Christ/Aslan was/is not tame!
Well, I tend to think I'm a very Christian person. But what does that have to do with the absurdity of Creationism?
The thread is on evolution calculations. If you look at what I posted in
Message 10 you will see why I believe such tasks are simply stupid.
We know Evolution happened. The evidence is simply overwhelming. We have a theory, the TOE which has done a remarkable job explaining how it happened. In 150+ years of testing, not only has it withstood all challenges, ever new development has confirmed it. The TOE is an extremely well supported theory.
To return to the idea of mathmatical models, one that shows evolution possible would be as functional as one that shows birds can fly. We can determine that birds fly by observation regardless of the model.
On the otherhand, and that show evolution impossible have about as much validity as one that showed cows can fly or that birds can't. We can determine the facts of either of those propositions through the same act of observation. Cows can't and birds can, regardless of the model.
So it is with Evolution. The facts, the evidence is there.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion