quote:
but, if the mutation rate is determined by comparing chimpanzee DNA with human DNA, what does it give us?
How such a research promotes TOE?
That work does assume evolution is true -- more specifically, common ancestry for humans and chimps is true. All large-scale study of genetics makes that assumption, since it's the only approach yet offered that makes sense of the data. You can also estimate the mutation rate without that assumption, however, by examing mutations that are occurring today and that are noticed because that cause disease:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...
You get just about the same answer whichever method you use. Put another way, the rate we observing mutations occurring today predicts how genetically different humans and chimpanzees should be if they diverged from a common ancestor five or six million years ago, and predicts it correctly. This is one of the many, many parts of genetics that makes sense if evolution is true, and no sense if it isn't.