Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Genesis to be taken literally Part II
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 3 of 105 (182544)
02-02-2005 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by AdminBrian
02-02-2005 4:48 AM


I often wonder what whales ate under this unbiblical fundamentalist scenario.
Vegekrill, obviously.
Not to put words in Terry's mouth, but the fundamentalist reply I've seen most often for "no death before the Fall" involves a "Biblical" definition of what can "die" - only that which has the breath of life in its nostrils. Stomata on tomato leaves presumably don't count as nostrils. The further logical consequences of this approach, though, need a little exploration - if Terry or anyone else here supports it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AdminBrian, posted 02-02-2005 4:48 AM AdminBrian has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 24 of 105 (187321)
02-21-2005 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by jjburklo
02-21-2005 7:52 PM


Re: A few dumb questions.
why would God create it if in the end he takes Adam out of the Eden so that he won't gain immortality?
1) 'Cause He didn't think it through very carefully.
or
2) 'Cause that's the way the story got passed down to the scribe that wrote it down in its present form.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by jjburklo, posted 02-21-2005 7:52 PM jjburklo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024