Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Genesis to be taken literally Part II
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 20 of 105 (187266)
02-21-2005 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jjburklo
02-21-2005 4:42 PM


Hi,
But its still an extremely interesting coincidence that God doesn't have a problem with Adam eating of the tree of Life until after the fall!!! Again, lets think, why would this be so? If man was mortal from the beginning then God would always have had a fear of Adam eating from the tree of life. God would have told Adam not to eat of it just like the tree of knowledge of good and evil from the beginning!
We have to remember that the authors of Genesis, and the final editor, were not writing for a critical audience, they were not concerned if the story was consistent or not. Most pre-renaissance 'history' writing was like this.
We shouldn't read too much into inconsistencies in the Bible.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jjburklo, posted 02-21-2005 4:42 PM jjburklo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024