stormwolfx2x writes:
I'm interested in what you guys think about immigrants in the workforce.
Like younger workers,(according to troy) immigrants are willing to work longer hours for less pay...
Immigration is a fact of life in America, and it is a way for Social Security to get paid for later Americans IF we tax the money of these people as we tax our own workers.
As to the issue directly,
Charles Knight writes:
And why shouldn't they? it's the market in action!
True enough, but the downside of this "market in action" is that blue collar labor gets pushed aside while white collar CEO's keep their jobs! America needs to look out for its citizens or we will become like Britain with a wider class disparity.
Percy,to Rrhain writes:
The point is that everyone's performance level declines with age, and that older expensive workers can be easily replaced by younger, cheaper and better performing workers. Experience can make up the difference, but as I pointed out in previous posts, the fast moving high-tech world often leaves workers with experience that is no longer valued.
Which is why I support seniority as a mandated workplace rule. (Unions are the only source of clout able to enforce this)
troy,referring to older workers writes:
I am saying, and have always been saying, that they shouldn't be expected to work the same way they worked 40 years earlier. If some of them can, good for them.
I absolutely agree. There should be some perks earned with age.
The bottem line should not be the arbitrator...or else society will have to tax the heck out of those greedy CEO's in order to support retirement programs. One way or another, it must get done.