Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should Sacred Studies be part of a general public school curricula
ProfessorR
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 161 (206086)
05-08-2005 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
04-27-2005 1:22 PM


My answer is "yes, definitely, absolutely." Children and youngsters must learn about world religions. They should be exposed to texts like the Bible, Rigveda, Al Q'uran, writings of Lao Tse, Confucius and others. It does not matter one bit, I think, whether the school is public or private. There should be classes explaining the concept of religion, the role of religion in the life of the humankind, and there should be reading assignments on that, both in secondary school and university. Of course, there should be no indoctrination in these classes (and again, it does not matter whether the school is public or private). --Richard
This message has been edited by ProfessorR, 05-08-2005 08:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 04-27-2005 1:22 PM jar has not replied

  
ProfessorR
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 161 (206410)
05-09-2005 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by EZscience
05-08-2005 9:48 PM


EZScience,
I don't think that religious *indoctrination* has its legitimate place in any school, public or private. Even if the cost of kids' education is covered by their parents who all belong to the same religious group, it still does not justify brainwashing these kids, or, especially, grooming them in the spirit of exclusivity and/or animosity to other religious doctrines.
From much the same standpoint, I do not think that "broad public tax support base" justifies "making education completely secular" - if the latter means not teaching kids anything about religion, eliminating the mere word from textbooks, etc.
Richard

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by EZscience, posted 05-08-2005 9:48 PM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by EZscience, posted 05-09-2005 10:08 AM ProfessorR has not replied

  
ProfessorR
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 161 (206458)
05-09-2005 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Brian
05-09-2005 10:19 AM


Of course, teaching religion in schools (public or private) should ALWAYS mean teaching "about" religion. Preaching, fostering a particular faith is not a function of a school, but of a church or other strictly religious organization.
EZ, I understand very well what you mean - I live in the Bible Belt of Bible Belts (east-central Mississippi). That really is a horrible problem and I don't know how to fix it. I think the STATE, the government must simply close schools where kids are taught literal 6-day creation in science classes, etc. Parents' will should not be taken into consideration at all, IMHO. That's one element of governmental dictatorship that I would support. After all, the US government will close down a school that teaches its kids that the earth is flat or that all Jews are evil monsters. Pretty much by the same token, it should not give accreditation to schools that substitute narrow-minded literalistic interpretation of certain religious texts for education.
Richard

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Brian, posted 05-09-2005 10:19 AM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024