No doubt this was wrong, and imo, not properly understood, nor investigated fully.
uh, yes, it was investigated. the parties in involved were court martialed in a court of military law. breaking the geneva convention is something people take very seriously.
But the point is the US military is not launching offensive operations against the civilians as the terrorists are.
we call it "war." they call it "holy war." it's a holier-than-thou argument at it's core. what we do is war, but what they do is terrorism. what we do is ritual, what they do is idolatry. same thing.
I am not sure what went on with the prison stuff, but our offensive military operations seem to be targetted on finding and killing the insurgents.
who are, btw, generally civilians, since they are not an organized state army. but that's generally not what people mean when they say "civilians" such as in the reference above. if we want to clarify, how about the term "non-combatant?"
and uh, if we're not rounding up non-combatants, how did so many get in abu ghraib, to get molested and abused?
אָרַח