I don't have time to moderate this thread today, nor even read it, but the little bit I have read thus far suggests it has strayed off-topic, and has gotten overly personal.
So here is a reminder of the OP topic.
The evos continued to argue with my statements about this overview I attempted, and with the YEC presupposition, FROM THEIR OWN presupposition (basically Science Rules as opposed to God Rules), instead of being able to recognize their presupposition itself, their use of it, stand back from it and just SEE the fundamental clash of worldviews for what they are.
This is in Faith and Belief, not a Science forum. It's already conceded by Faith and the whole point of the OP that she and YECers include some different presuppositions and standards than evolutionists or "Science" does.
So let's don't beat a dead horse in the ground. If you think Faith's position is unreasonable, then discuss that. Are the presuppositions reasonable or not?
Insisting her position is unreasonable because it does not conform to the same presuppositions, in other words, the same scientific standards, is not going to fly here.
This is the Faith and Belief forum. You got a problem with faith because it's not always as scientific as science theories, fine. We all know who of you have that problem, but the basis here has to be whether something is reasonable or not, not whether it is scientific.
My own suggestion (the comments above are not suggestions) is that the forum may want to consider that even if a faith position is reasonable for an individual, how should that position be discussed via a vis science when the ideas cross, such as with aspects of YECism.
I also think's it worth noting, as some have, that not all YECers claim they need to resort to the Bible to make their stance, but at the same time, both Faith and the evos here have made arguments that their faith is always a component of their thinking.
So it's the OP, or the thread goes nowhere.