Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Near-death experiences and consciousness
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 46 of 145 (264285)
11-29-2005 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Ben!
11-29-2005 7:10 PM


Re: Under Discussion for one.
Btw, as an aside, it's interesting that one piece of a skull can warrant articles, reconstructions, and reviews of evolutionary paths and is treated as significant non-anecdotal evidence, but at the same time, an account of a NDE where someone remembers specifics while their brain was not functioning is anecdotal.
Imo, this simply shows the incredible inconsistency and biasness of science overall towards certain belief systems.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Ben!, posted 11-29-2005 7:10 PM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by jar, posted 11-29-2005 7:29 PM randman has replied
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2005 8:11 PM randman has not replied
 Message 56 by nator, posted 11-29-2005 8:55 PM randman has replied
 Message 58 by arachnophilia, posted 11-29-2005 10:00 PM randman has not replied
 Message 61 by Ben!, posted 11-29-2005 10:27 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 47 of 145 (264289)
11-29-2005 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Wounded King
11-29-2005 7:10 PM


Re: Under Discussion for one.
and the two anecdotal accounts, one within the paper and one referenced, perhaps the referenced one is not merely anecdotal we would need access to that paper to find out
Why is this anecdotal? It seems to me we can find a piece of a skull and build a whole theory of a creature being ancestral to whales or some such, but we have 2 solid accounts showing NDEs occurred after flat EEGs in this paper, and the author's comments in the magazine article that this is what is occurring, and somehow it's questionable???
Anecdotal evidence is real evidence, it just isn't strong or compelling evidence as it is so dependent on the subjective experiences of human beings.
The problem is within the context of discussing conciousness, we are dealing with a subjective aspect of humanity and as such, you are going to have to include subjective evidence such as checking the memories of the patient with the nurses' or other records. I think dismissing such evidence as anecdotal is a weak argument and not reasonable.
Furthermore, keep in mind we are dealing with a medical journal and that patients' subjective experience here is a valid area of research.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Wounded King, posted 11-29-2005 7:10 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 49 of 145 (264292)
11-29-2005 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by jar
11-29-2005 7:29 PM


Re: Under Discussion for one.
So we can have one small piece of evidence, a skull, that could have arisen through any number of means, and it's OK to wildly speculate on it. It's valid science to call it aquatic or whatever.
But people remembering events their brain could not observe is somehow inconclusive, eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by jar, posted 11-29-2005 7:29 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by jar, posted 11-29-2005 7:38 PM randman has not replied
 Message 51 by Wounded King, posted 11-29-2005 7:41 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 62 of 145 (264360)
11-30-2005 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by arachnophilia
11-29-2005 8:13 PM


Re: here's a problem
and THOSE effects seem to explain nde's.
How? We have a peer-reviewed study in a prestigious scientific journal claiming otherwise, and we have your statement with no data given to back it up.
The evidence strongly suggests that NDEs can occur when the brain is not active because there are observed examples of this occuring.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by arachnophilia, posted 11-29-2005 8:13 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by nwr, posted 11-30-2005 1:41 AM randman has replied
 Message 101 by arachnophilia, posted 11-30-2005 4:48 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 63 of 145 (264361)
11-30-2005 1:19 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by nator
11-29-2005 8:55 PM


Re: Under Discussion for one.
Simple. Some of the reports of NDEs conform to independently confirmed real world events such which nurses did what, and other facts not observed by the patient's brain.
That's what the doctor is claiming in the study and in the quotes from the magazine article.
Exactly why do you think Lancelet published the study?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by nator, posted 11-29-2005 8:55 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 4:31 AM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 64 of 145 (264362)
11-30-2005 1:28 AM


Let's get back to the OP
This is the doctors claims, and the published study was submitted to back up those claims. Let's look at what he is saying.
The most remarkable thing, Van Lommel says, is that his patients have such consciousness-expanding experiences while their brains register no activity. But that’s impossible, according to the current level of medical knowledge. Because most scientists believe that consciousness occurs in the brain, this creates a mystery: How can people experience consciousness while they are unconscious during a cardiac arrest (a clinical death)?
After all those years of intensive study, Van Lommel still speaks with reverence about the miracle of the near-death experience. “At that moment these people are not only conscious; their consciousness is even more expansive than ever. They can think extremely clearly, have memories going back to their earliest childhood and experience an intense connection with everything and everyone around them. And yet the brain shows no activity at all!”
This has raised a number of large questions for Van Lommel: “What is consciousness and where is it located? What is my identity? Who is doing the observing when I see my body down there on the operating table? What is life? What is death?”
He is clearly stating that in these experiences there is an increase in thought clarity, insight, speed, awareness, empathy, etc,....when "the brain shows no activity at all!".
So how is this increased level of awareness and consciousness happening when the brain is inactive? Even if you claim the brain is somehow active but we just don't observe it, that doesn't explain how such an increase in what we normally think of as mental awareness, ability, etc,..can occur when the organ that suppossed to produce it is seemingly totally inactive, and if active in an unknown way, is reasonably far less active than normal and being deprived of what it needs to function properly.
So let's hear some real arguments fo the doctor's claims.
In order to convince his colleagues of the validity of these new insights, Van Lommel first had to demonstrate that this expansion of the consciousness occurred, in fact, during the period of brain death. It was not difficult to prove. Patients were often able to describe precisely what had happened during their cardiac arrest. They knew, for example, exactly where the nurse put their dentures or what doctors and family members had said. How would someone whose brain wasn’t active know these things?
Nevertheless, some scientists continue to assert that these experiences must happen at a time when there is still some brain function going on. Van Lommel is crystal clear in his response: “When the heart stops beating, blood flow stops within a second. Then, 6.5 seconds later, EEG activity starts to change due to the shortage of oxygen. After 15 seconds there is a straight, flat line and the electrical activity in the cerebral cortex has disappeared completely.
This message has been edited by randman, 11-30-2005 01:29 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 5:13 AM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 65 of 145 (264363)
11-30-2005 1:31 AM


another bit of evidence cited by the doctor
Not to do cut and paste but no one seems to be addressing this.
Van Lommel contends that the brain does not produce consciousness or store memories. He points out that American computer science expert Simon Berkovich and Dutch brain researcher Herms Romijn, working independently of one another, came to the same conclusion: that it is impossible for the brain to store everything you think and experience in your life. This would require a processing speed of 1024 bits per second. Simply watching an hour of television would already be too much for our brains. “If you want to store that amount of information”along with the associative thoughts produced”your brain would be pretty much full,” Van Lommel says. “Anatomically and functionally, it is simply impossible for the brain to have this level of speed.”
On the subject of perceptions without brain activity of events, conversations, etc,..in the real world.
Also of interest are NDEs that involved alleged veridical perception. This refers to accurate perception of specific, unique events that the NDEr’s physical body could not have seen or heard, and that the NDEr could not have figured out through reasoning and logic. These cases include NDE vision in persons blind from birth. They also include NDE vision and hearing in a woman undergoing brain surgery whose eyes were taped shut and whose ears were plugged with a small speaker emitting a clicking sound. Meanwhile, her body was chilled down, her heart stopped and did not beat for nearly an hour, and the blood was drained from her brain so surgeons could repair a blood vessel. By all measures, her brain was completely inactive. Nevertheless, she correctly described instruments used by the doctors and conversations held between the doctors and nurses conducting the operation. So NDEs are subjective experiences, but they also may be objective”“real” in terms of physical, earthly reality.
About Near-Death Experiences
some interesting accounts, some better than others
Page not found - Near-Death Experiences and the Afterlife
This message has been edited by randman, 11-30-2005 01:42 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by crashfrog, posted 11-30-2005 3:20 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 67 of 145 (264368)
11-30-2005 1:48 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by nwr
11-30-2005 1:41 AM


Re: here's a problem
Well, obviously the author of the study feels otherwise, and I do as well. We aren't going to start killing off people and reviving them just to test this out. So the studies have to rely on events and what the data from machines and people's accounts record. That's not that unusual when looking at medical issues.
Maybe more funding will enable more studies with more imaginative ways to assess NDEs, but to date, all the evidence suggests that NDEs include perceptions beyond the brain. It is true that they also can be linked to neaural activity, but they do not appear limited by that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nwr, posted 11-30-2005 1:41 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by nwr, posted 11-30-2005 2:09 AM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 69 of 145 (264371)
11-30-2005 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by nwr
11-30-2005 2:09 AM


Re: here's a problem
The peer-reviewed paper lists 2 examples with details of events remembered that were verified by others present, and more or less does not go into depth with all of the patients' experiences in that area. The magazine article in the OP states the doctor worked hard to get the study published, and one reason was to show that consciousness appears to increase in levels of thought and awareness among some people with a decrease and flat-lining of EEGs. So even though the study does not include a lot of instances verifying patients observing things when their brain was not functioning, it does give some, and certainly verifies conscious activity when the brain was not active.
If you want to claim all that activity occurs prior to the brain going inactive, the instances mentioned where patients observed events and items after that period of time suggests that NDEs are on-going long after brain activity ceases. You can claim the evidence is weak or whatever, but that's an argument from incredulity. All of the evidence thus far agrees with the doctor's analysis.
Moreover, the peer-reviewed paper is not the whole of the claims or the doctor's work, and in the OP, he clearly asserts it is a fact that NDEs occur when brain activity has ceased.
So let's don't quibble about the peer-reviewed paper, but discuss the data and how it apparently indicates consciousness occurs and can even heighten without brain activity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by nwr, posted 11-30-2005 2:09 AM nwr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 4:39 AM randman has not replied
 Message 141 by Theodoric, posted 12-14-2005 3:53 AM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 78 of 145 (264458)
11-30-2005 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by jar
11-30-2005 10:50 AM


Re: Filling in
Nevertheless, some scientists continue to assert that these experiences must happen at a time when there is still some brain function going on. Van Lommel is crystal clear in his response: “When the heart stops beating, blood flow stops within a second. Then, 6.5 seconds later, EEG activity starts to change due to the shortage of oxygen. After 15 seconds there is a straight, flat line and the electrical activity in the cerebral cortex has disappeared completely. We cannot measure the brain stem, but testing on animals has demonstrated that activity has ceased there as well. Moreover, you can prove that the brain stem is no longer functioning because it regulates our basic reflexes, such as the pupil response and swallowing reflex, which no longer respond.
Wonder why the author then is saying the opposite? Is he lying, part of the creationist/God-believer/ID-wedge conspiracy?
Anyone care to assess why the author claims NEDs occur when the brain is not functioning?
This message has been edited by randman, 11-30-2005 01:18 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 10:50 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by nwr, posted 11-30-2005 1:39 PM randman has not replied
 Message 81 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 1:49 PM randman has replied
 Message 82 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 1:59 PM randman has replied
 Message 92 by crashfrog, posted 11-30-2005 3:24 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 79 of 145 (264462)
11-30-2005 1:28 PM


more comments from the doctor
From these studies we know that in our prospective study of patients that have been clinically dead (VF on the ECG) no electric activity of the cortex of the brain (flat EEG) must have been possible, but also the abolition of brain stem activity like the loss of the corneareflex, fixed dilated pupils and the loss of the gag reflex is a clinical finding in those patients. However, patients with an NDE can report a clear consciousness, in which cognitive functioning, emotion, sense of identity, and memory from early childhood was possible, as well as perception from a position out and above their “dead” body. Because of the sometimes reported and verifiable out-of -body experiences, like the case of the dentures reported in our study, we know that the NDE must happen during the period of unconsciousness, and not in the first or last second of this period.
So we have to conclude that NDE in our study was experienced during a transient functional loss of all functions of the cortex and of the brainstem. It is important to mention that there is a well documented report of a patient with constant registration of the EEG during cerebral surgery for an gigantic cerebral aneurysm at the base of the brain, operated with a body temperature between 10 and 15 degrees, she was put on the heart-lung machine, with VF, with all blood drained from her head, with a flat line EEG, with clicking devices in both ears, with eyes taped shut, and this patient experienced an NDE with an out-of-body experience, and all details she perceived and heard could later be verified. (8)
....
The study of patients with NDE, however, clearly shows us that consciousness with memories, cognition, with emotion, self-identity, and perception out and above a life-less body is experienced during a period of a non-functioning brain (transient pancerebral anoxia).
http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/whoswho/vanLommel.htm

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 83 of 145 (264480)
11-30-2005 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by jar
11-30-2005 1:49 PM


Re: More misrepresentation and misdirection
I posted another article written by the doctor himself saying the same thing as the reporter said he said. He consistently claims NDEs occur during flat EEGs. He says that in the Lancet article, to the reporter, in articles he has written available on the web, etc,...
He's absolutely clear on what he maintains here.
If you want to try to argue the NDEs must occur prior to the EEG going flat as WK does, fine. The instances of verifiable veridigal perception are what the doctor counters with, and he is very clear that he feels that proves EEG occur when the brain has ceased functioning. He also persuasively discounts medical causes such as brain cells dying due to oxygen deprivation and other medical causes.
So what do you have to say to that?
You believe consciousness must only reside in the brain? Why?
This is getting a little off-topic, but not by much. Do you think people have a soul? If they do have a soul, a consciousness that's not solely a by-product of the brain, then wouldn't this data make sense? In fact, it only seems to make sense if out-of-body consciousness or soul exists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 1:49 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 2:14 PM randman has replied
 Message 86 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 2:17 PM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 84 of 145 (264486)
11-30-2005 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Wounded King
11-30-2005 1:59 PM


Re: Filling in
OK, just as long as we are clear that he is stating the NDEs occur when brain activity ceases. Your issue is you think the evidence is too weak to rule out this occurring in those 10 seconds the brain is diminishing in function, right?
It is interesting though that the reports of increased mental awareness and activity don't correspond well with a decrease in brain function, and moreover, the study rules out medical causes such as loss of brain cells and things like that.
Moreover, although you find it unconvincing, the veridical perception reported still remains unexplained by your take on the matter. In other words, we have to dismiss that evidence entirely in order to make it all fit within the 10 seconds. I think it's more reasonable to develop a hypothesis and theory which takes all of the evidence into account.
This message has been edited by randman, 11-30-2005 02:11 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 1:59 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 87 of 145 (264494)
11-30-2005 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by jar
11-30-2005 2:14 PM


what misdirection?
You claim Van Pommel is not saying the things I said he says, and I quoted him in 3 different areas where he explicitly states NDEs occur when there is no brain activity.
Agree with me now, or not, on what the doctor's claims are?
I ask about the soul because that's really another term for the same idea of consciousness not residing exclusively in the body. You say you are a Christian. So presumably you believe in the concept of a soul, right?
So why are you doubtful and surprised that people with NDEs would describe their experience pretty much like what you would expect if the concept of the soul were true, namely out-of-body at death, increases of awareness, mental abilities, empathy and well-being?
I think it's a fair question jar. Why are you so against the concept that there could be evidence for a soul if you believe the soul really exists, as you suggest when you say you are a Christian on other threads?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 2:14 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by jar, posted 11-30-2005 3:16 PM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 88 of 145 (264499)
11-30-2005 2:29 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Wounded King
11-30-2005 2:17 PM


Re: More misrepresentation and misdirection
My extensive watching of ER suggests that they would have started CPR and ventilation before they intubated him, the explicit purpose of both of which is to maintain oxygenation and circulation in vital organs. So we may assume that there was some oxygenated blood getting to the patients brain prior to the nurse removing his dentures.
He addresses that specifically and generally in his references to medical causes and in the other article written by him I quoted from.
Moreover, one of the accounts he relies on deals with a woman who had the blood drained from here brain, operated on at very cold temperatures, with her eyes taped shut and yet she a very accurate description of details of the operation.
It is important to mention that there is a well documented report of a patient with constant registration of the EEG during cerebral surgery for an gigantic cerebral aneurysm at the base of the brain, operated with a body temperature between 10 and 15 degrees, she was put on the heart-lung machine, with VF, with all blood drained from her head, with a flat line EEG, with clicking devices in both ears, with eyes taped shut, and this patient experienced an NDE with an out-of-body experience, and all details she perceived and heard could later be verified. (8
http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/whoswho/vanLommel.htm

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 2:17 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Wounded King, posted 11-30-2005 3:27 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024