A proof against ID and Creationism

As I understand the concepts of IDs and Creationist, they say that life (to include all of the universe, atoms, quarks, etc) is too WONDERFUL and complex to have evolved by itself. Just to provide an easy reference, call this the wonderful theory.One method of testing a theory it to see how it holds up when applied to others subjects. Let’s apply this wonderful theory to god with the assumption that the theory is valid. God is indeed too wonderful and complex to have evolved by itself or his-self if you prefer.Lets make the obvious explicit. According to the wonderful theory, god had to have been helped along by his own god. Well where did that god come from? The answer is that when the wonderful theory is applied to god, it shows that god cannot exist. So something is wrong here?I see two possibilities:1. The wonderful theory is right. This means that god cannot exist because it is not possible for there to be creator of god. That creator would have the same restriction, as would his creator, ad nauseum.2. The wonderful theory is wrong. The basic premise of ID and creationism is wrong. To say that our wonderfulness and complexity imply a god is patently false.So which is it? Are there more possibilities that I have omitted?

Creationism/ID is not specifically related to God. In Creationism, it's the "Creator"; and in ID, it's the "Designer.

Both of these theories claim to be science (unlike religion), so they must follow the rules of science, i.e., they must be able to support their claims with empirical (physical) evidence (actually, they shouldn't start out making claims in the first place, but that's a whole other plate of cookies).

Creationists/ID Theorists have yet to provide satisfactory evidence proving the existence of their Creator/Designer

Without such evidence, we are left to do nothing but conclude that there is no Creator/Designer.

This statement isn't one you can make. That is because you have no real idea of what evidence there is. If you know about .01 % of it I'd be surprised.What you can say is: "I know so little about this that I can allow myself to conclude what I want as long as I don't learn about it."

That is the problem with Creationism/ID: presuppositions. Read my signature. Darwin came to the conclusion of evolution AFTER looking at the evidence. Creationists/ID Theorists START with the conclusion, and then try to prove it through misinterpretations of the evidence.

"missing link," it wouldn't be missing anymore.

There is no conflict between the TOE and Christianity, however if ID were proven it would then mean that there is no GOD