A proof against ID and Creationism

Aye, there's the rub...the rub that exposes the ID agenda. The ambiguity is deliberate and dissembling. One wonders if lies can profitably be told in the service of truth.If the designer is a deity, then ID is merely Creationism in a stolen lab coat; if the designer is not a deity, then ID answers nothing.We can narrow the ID implications further. Not all gods are described as eternal: only the God of the Book can put a stopper in the infinite regression of designers; a god could be a Younger God, a Lesser God, an elevated mortal, all subject to queries about their designers.The ID ambiguity is a Trojan Horse. I wonder if God is pleased with their deception. Is this how Yahweh conquers? Tarted up like a...theory.

Don't be intentionally thick. It isn't necessary.The evidence for evolution lies in tracing how frogs came to be frogs, not in speculation about whether speciation will produce something else.

---

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------