Invictus said:
Creationism/ID is not specifically related to God. In Creationism, it's the "Creator"; and in ID, it's the "Designer.
I see the term designer and creator as the same. unless the IDer is saying that the designer is not the God of the Bible. (which is prb. the case most of the time.
Both of these theories claim to be science (unlike religion), so they must follow the rules of science, i.e., they must be able to support their claims with empirical (physical) evidence (actually, they shouldn't start out making claims in the first place, but that's a whole other plate of cookies).
Why is it not scienc? because it is not observeable? Neither is evolution. I have yet to see a 'missing link' for starters.
2ndly, we do have physical evidence. We have the same evidence that you do, we just interpret it differently because we have different presuppositions.
Creationists/ID Theorists have yet to provide satisfactory evidence proving the existence of their Creator/Designer
science is incapable of proving anything 100%.
Without such evidence, we are left to do nothing but conclude that there is no Creator/Designer.
But evolutionsis have not provied satifactory evidence proving thier ideas either. Thus, I am left to do nothing but conclude that evolutionis not true. =)